This is called a logical fallacy when you make false assertions in a statement
I do care about privacy, I don't trust the govt and they can't get my btc.
none of these arguments will make people care about monero except the price going up.
You have a chicken and the egg problem with most shitcoins.
🌻
Login to reply
Replies (8)
irony
/ī′rə-nē, ī′ər-/
noun
The use of words to express something different from and often opposite to their literal meaning.
An expression or utterance marked by a deliberate contrast between apparent and intended meaning.
Incongruity between what might be expected and what actually occurs.
There have been previous conversations between he and I friend.
If he didnt care about privacy at all, I wouldn't live rent free in his head 😜
The fact is
there is no wealth without privacy.
if they know you have it, it is possible to confiscate it. Otherwise you are just trusting the legal system.
People who actually NEED strong censorship resistance already use monero.
Its also used more than LN for payments anywhere both are accepted.
if "nobody cares" its because you're in an echo chamber and trust the system to protect your private property.
Money supply must be transparent, transactions must be private.
Monero is missing the first. Bitcoin has both.
NGU mentality exposed.
NGU follows a sound monetary policy matched with a use case.
Today I found out that shitcoin defenders use this fallacy a lot. It was a tiring day debating with a Monero defender and having to keep punctuating point by point the fallacies.
shitcoins themselves are based on a metaphysical fallacy: they mistake accident for essence.
it would be like saying anything with blue eyes is a human being.
beyond retarded
oh look, a shiny new crypto
so many features


Paper USD has pretty good privacy, but is not a good store of value. There's not much demand for an electronic version of this electronic type of cash since it's also not worth saving.
Why go throguh the trouble when it's easier to use the ATM?