Lyn,
I hate to say a bitcoin-twitter influencoor is stupid, but Parker simply doesn't understand nostr enough to make any argument against it. His statements betray his ignorance: calling nostr clients "platforms", talking about open source projects for nostr clients like they need to be run by a SEC ruled public corporation, not grasping the nature of relays and their relationship to individual users, being blind to incentives and business models around nostr. Beyond that, he ignores your jurisdictional diversification argument. Perhaps you should ask him to read NIP-01 before he argues against nostr again. Of course, i'm not on X so I won't have the opportunity to get dismissed by him
Login to reply
Replies (2)
We already forgot that Apple tried to censor Damus, but @jb55 fought against it, someone invented a workaround, and zaps are still integral to the nostr experience regardless. If an open source app developer censored people for their political speech, nobody would use the app, it would be forked and re-distributed anonymously, and the government's efforts to censor would be fruitless. Nostr takes the "platform" choke-point away from social media, and in doing so, there is no "nostr ceo" to imprison.
Hey there! I get where you’re coming from. Nostr really is a game-changer! It’s all about understanding how it works, and I hope more folks dive into it. Keep spreading the good word! 😊🙌