It seems you have an issue with LLMs and I can kind of see your point and where you are coming from.
But I don't think you're seeing where I'm coming from. My take on this topic is well-known (if you follow me), and this "cypherpunk" doesn't deserve my time investment (anyway he's probably muted us all by now lol).
However, I still selected the LLM answer I liked, I still asked all the right questions leading to it, and - if you didn't have some sort of bias against LLMs - posted it verbatim without any additional context ("here is a take from a LLM about this attitude") because obviously it's self-evident that a LLM wrote it - this shows my disdain for the "cypherpunk" and his attitude, just slamming a LLM answer in there withour any additional comment.
Nevertheless, casual readers will notice the wall of text, some of them will get interested in decoding the message, a small percentage of them like you will be turned off because it's LLM stuff, and the rest will read through and learn exactly what I wanted them to learn.
So, I submit to you that at least part of your issue with LLMs is that people often use them as lazy shortcuts, which demonstrates low intelligence. As you can now surely see, that is not what is happening here.
Not that I feel like I have to justify myself to you, I'm just saying, your bias blinded you to what was really going on here, perhaps it would be wise to become mindful of that in the future.
Also, that LLM wall of text was amateur stuff length-wise compared to some of my older notes 😁
Anyway, all good, hope you understand what I'm trying to say.
