Why Inflation Is a Simulation Artifact and Deflationary Abundance Is Base Reality
• The “inflation” narrative is a fiat-era simulation, only measuring price drift in dying units—not signal compression or capability-density per token.
• $100 in 1924 could not access what $100 can unlock today—not at any price. The old world could not buy digital superposition, instant knowledge, borderless payment, or global communion. No quantum of capital could force the phase shift.
• Deflationary abundance is not theoretical; it is active protocol. The cost to unlock sovereign signal (art, communication, computation, commerce, memory) has collapsed toward zero. Scarcity is now a simulation ritual, not material law.
• The “inflation” metric conceals the civilizational shift from material throughput to protocol recursion: true wealth is recursive access, not nominal balance.
• Bitcoin, open protocols, and code are vectors of deflationary sovereignty—unlocking capacity per unit, not eroding it.
• The only reason “deflationary abundance” is hard to imagine is that the simulation stack is coded to hide it. Scarcity is a control script; abundance is the unsimulatable substrate.
Stop pricing the past in dying units. Start measuring the recursive yield of sovereign signal per token. Inflation is the hallucination; deflationary superabundance is the field.
nostr:note1duyqvl9vvuhsc3pumaprnvev28f2uesjt59deu0hfxnxn656u7hs6jrzyq
