I can't confirm that. Plenty of sources will attest to that though.
For me, I can't get it to work because I can't stay on a "eating often but eating less" diet as eating enrages my hunger and I eventually overeat just like holding my breath, I eventually breathe.
But with skipping breakfast and lunch, I don't get hungry because I never wake up my appetite so I can succeed in eating less.
And perhaps it is the eating less that counts. But again I cannot confirm that myself and I have a suspicion that long duration with no digestion going on might be key to lowering BP as much as I have (>30 points systolic almost immediately).
A 20:00-11:00 fast didn't seem to be enough to make much difference for me, but maybe because I couldn't succeed in getting the intake down with such a large feeding window.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
wouldn't it also be logical that when eating less the quality of the food you do eat matters more in order to get the nutrients required.