I'm saying that the only thing the user owns, is the data and application/relay settings stored in events. If they keep it in events, then they can move from relay to app, and have the same setup, everywhere. So, you would choose your relay based upon service, including whether they honor what is in your events. For instance, @cloud fodder allows me to use my npub's lists (mute, follows, favorites, etc.) to determine who is allowed to use my private relay. I edit those lists and click a button in relay.tools and it updates the blocks/allows. That means I could have 15 different relays, from different providers and/or self-hosted, and they'd all have the same settings, if I choose. Or I could have a set of lists by topic and have a book club relay, a Christian chat relays, a dev relay, etc. Filter.wine does something similar with WoT. It is controlled by the changes to your follow list. I house the relay and app settings within my events.

Replies (3)

What AI+FOSS does is end the concept of the Killer App, where you just code some blob, sell the rights to Microsoft, and walk away a gazillionaire. You will now actually have to add concrete value and do real labour. There has to be some reason I keep going back to This One Person, and that won't be the app. Make Software Development Work Again.
I agree. I wanted to add that, in the future, most people will be willing to pay directly to client entrepreneurs and other service providers because doing so will overall improve their opportunity costs
Exodia38
Ok, now I understand, thanks. My opinion about this topic is that in the future everyone will be able to make clients with pretty little investment (almost zero). If clients become increasingly interoperable over time and everyone can create them, this means everyone has individually the benefits of interoperability BUT that doesn't mean those clients won't come without tradeoffs (see, I'm one of those that think that everything comes with tradeoffs. Also, the more useful or convenient, the more tradeoffs it has) If everyone has to deal individually (or even in a Dunbar number fashion) with those tradeoffs, that means everyone will have to soften them paying MONEY (summing it up: the fact that everyone can make highly interoperable clients almost for free means they will have a clear DEMAND for the things that make clients smoother). Another thing is that individuals won't be really able to deflect the cost of making clients smooth by passing that responsibility to big corporations because that will be economically inviable in a free market Everything I said makes me conclude that there will never be free lunch again because clients will be an eternal source of demand for everything Nostr related (Relays, dev work, etc) and the starting point for a sustained division of labor. So, saying that relays are cost centers is highly gauche
View quoted note →
โ†‘