Unfortunately, it shows how vulnerable it is to always depend on third parties. Geyserfund's work is very commendable in these cases. There is still a need for the end users themselves to manage their own funds in these cases. Hopefully these users in war zones will learn better practices. And maybe Geyfund will evolve to a more self-custodial version. Who knows

Replies (2)

Geyser is fully self-custodial. With governments going as far as attempting to criminalize the building of UIs (see Tornado Cash), this is not a question of self custody. Any project building software to interface with the Bitcoin network utilized to send money where governments don't want to see it is at risk.
Okey. The picture is clearer ๐Ÿ‘ So here they are practically forcing the whole development not to have a face, a recognized address. Since they want to go after everything that interacts with the Net. The attacks from Tornado and Samourai are already making it very clear how the governments are acting. It is sad. But for now this is a wake-up call about geyser. They will push harder and harder and in other ways. It is time to be antifragile within the community.
โ†‘