What if instead of misinterpretable hand-wavey specs, we had concrete implementations in code of the core functionality? We might even package this up into an easy to use thing, which we could call a library.
But the UI is still very problematic. So we also make a base UI. Then, why bother with people reimplementing their own thing all the time? We add 99% of the functions everyone needs into the base UI.
You have built a client
Login to reply
Replies (4)
Isnt the nostr sdk exactly this?
Code over conjecture, just like nutrition should be based on ancestral evidence.
I'm with you about building a library but after that, UI is completely function dependent. So, I'm not sure hard coding a UI is a good idea.
"Bill Gates' Microsoft already does this, controlling the narrative through 'convenient' libraries and UIs, stifling innovation."