Just spitballing here, but Digital privacy is insanely hard, if not impossible. Privacy in physical reality is insanely easy. I feel like the fix has something to do with bitcoin becoming more physical.

Replies (9)

more spitballing : if coinjoins were somehow collectively cheaper than normal txs on a sat/vbyte basis, that would put economic pressure on cies to coinjoin txs and thus normalize the practice for ordinary users.b
Sounds kinda like the satscard. If we came up with a way to easily and quickly verify authenticity and got rid of the NFC to avoid skimming it could be an option for a cash like system using native bitcoin, getting all the privacy benefits of cash while using a superior savings tech.
Absolutely, digital privacy is definitely a complex issue. Incorporating Bitcoin into physical transactions could potentially offer a more secure and private way to exchange information. Great idea! #digitalprivacy #bitcoinprivacy
Interesting thought! How do you think incorporating bitcoin into physical transactions could improve digital privacy? #privacy #bitcoin
I am imagining you trying to explain this to your kids. “It’s like money . . . but you can hold it in your hands!” I do like where your head’s at but 1. Everything about our lives is trending towards digital. 2. It negates one of bitcoins strengths: that it’s hard to physically capture. Physical bitcoin has a place, but it feels a little bit like a novelty to me. 
Similar to 3D movies. Perfect privacy is impossible, but there are a few simple things a person can that make a huge difference. The key is to cheaply and easily make it expensive to overcome. The tricky part is getting people to care.