- WHEN MOST PEOPLE AGREE MEMPOOLS WILL NEVER CLEAR AGAIN.
- NOT VERY BUT THAT ALONE MAKES PROPOSALS CONTENTIOUS.
- FIVE YEARS IS JUST A NUMBER. NOT TIED TO IT. JUST A FAR OUT DATE SO FORK HAS MULTIPLE RELEASES NOT JUST ONE. BIGGEST CONCERN WITH A HARD FORK IS A BUG WITHOUT BACKWARDS COMPATIBLE CLIENTS.
Login to reply
Replies (4)
moar edu., moar engagement, moar network, - the real ngu imho/)........uP/
Most people would be more than happy to custodial LN or use ecash from a mint controlled by their bank.
In general we need to stop pretending 95% people currently share or will ever share our values. Entertaining changes based on the assumption that one day people will all the sudden care about sovereignty is an error imo
It's not about will they, it's about can they. Having optionality makes LSPs and mints incentive compatible.
- I think we'll realize private mempools before we have agreement on memepools never clearing. Then the status of mempools will live in eternal superposition of both clear and full. Do you think mempools should reflect consensus?
- agreed.
- The last part of this statement makes me ponder all the software dependecies that are built up by clients. For example, in the event of a hard fork, what side does BDK take?