Jack K's avatar
Jack K jackk@primal.net 2 days ago
I am 100% certain that Bitcoin will have a URSF for the quantum “upgrades”. Quantum will be the most contentious fork in history where Bitcoin’s physics battles fiat physics for control of Bitcoin. As Jeff Booth said, most people will be on the wrong side of the fork. Quantum is the end game fork before Valhalla. The true plebs will resist in the toughest of times. The decentralized quantum computer will stand firm in the physics Satoshi instantiated in Genesis. There is no second best 🫡

Replies (6)

AJ2884's avatar
AJ2884 yesterday
This topic reminds me of Pascal's Wager, only seemingly without anything analogous to the "many gods" objection.
Jack K's avatar
Jack K jackk@primal.net yesterday
Bitcoin is proof of quantized time. The answer lies in mapping a quantized block of time to the Planck scale. Discrete time demands discrete superposition. Logically for conservation to be upheld, measurement must occur at each Planck tick of time, meaning Superpostion is not a continuous unitary evolution. All states must be classical at each unit of time for conservation, energy and matter cannot be double spent at measurement, only between measurement. This ontology of time breaks the paradigm of centralized quantum computers. Bitcoin is not a theory of physics. Bitcoin is a physical system that computes the relationship between energy, information and time at the quantized level. How many blocks of proof will it take to falsify the axiom of continuous time?
1 replies ↓
↑