Yes, Bcashers also attempted to hijack control of the Bitcoin network by convincing people that they could “vote” by controlling more nodes (insanely wrong, Bitcoin is defined by what chain has done the most proof of work). They whipped up discontent and tried to give a mob of ignorant social media users influence over the development pipeline. So the way knots is operating is both rhetorically and operationally familiar. Absolutely another Hearn situation, to the letter.
Login to reply
Replies (3)
Yep and they prey on people who lack the experience to understand the fundamental technical/economic/security/social underpinnings.
It's actually more complex than the chain that has done the most proof of work, I tried explaining it here:
Compromised Core are hijacking Bitcoin.
Compromised Core became the bcashers.
BIP 110 returns Bitcoin to a state from 2022.


No it doesn't lol.
You obviously haven't looked at the code.