As I said, I don't follow Luke, but briefly searching for some related posts, his argument doesn't appear to be CSAM on the blockchain = all noderunners are paedophiles, but instead that this is a legal matter that will end in jail. IANAL, but I don't think this is correct (in the USA at least), though the framing is important. I do agree that his ultimate intentions are likely for greater censorship and I wouldn't personally hire him to run a hotdog stand, but I reiterate that it's not acceptable to level accusations like this against a guy with 11 children using his real name. Vigilante justice is real. Once again, if there actually were evidence this would be a different story