The CIA has even gotten involved in the development of Bitcoin.
nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpl8hpfzul2qha25p8wd63gm46ufax95lfgnl8h9v84y3zt0k05m7qqsxgn9ewcldusu7cyh748l0xhtdgsvczjwwwf6j0huv3aklr8dv04sy9cshc
Login to reply
Replies (9)

Geezus Leroy Christ! She's a CORE developer?!? We're fuuuuuuuuuuuuuucked, if this their leadership. ๐คฎ๐คข๐คฎ๐คข
Is #bitcoin the ultimate honeypot?
For 15 years. Barely news. Almost anybody of the early high profile devs has ties to secret agencies.
Of course sheโs not the leadership ๐
DAFUQ wrong with people not using logic?
If she's important enough to be on camera talking about her role in on a project, she's in leadership. She may not be in the inner circle, but she's near decision making... unfortunately.
Who else has confirmed her status?
Being on camera has never meant โ leadership.โ Iโve never found this to be true in any organization before. Gen.
Letโs say youโre right & she is in leadership. Could she be an active plant to ignite others? That would be a logical choice IMLE.
IMO, Of course she can be a plant. Who takes a job that you know nothing about? Then the first thing she wants to do is make changes. I've seen her in other videos talking this kind of crazy talk. Once she's solidified her position, she'll start hiring/recruiting other like-minded devs and change the culture of the project/business. Which changes the focus and goals of the organization. In this case, whether the blockchain is for a storage of value (money transactions), or a storage of data (a database).
Thus far it has been for both.