If they didn't notice that they lost this battle when Peter Todd put the entirety of BIP-444 in a transaction in a way that was BIP-444 compliant it's a good sign you're arguing with someone who can't listen to reason.
Just enjoy the airdropped fork, assuming you can dump it before the 51% attacks and zero market value make it completely zero bid. Big if.
Not saying anyone has to like the fact that this is how information works. But heads in sand rarely change the nature of reality.
At BEST it'd solve a legal problem -- but only one of their own making. The ethics aren't any different; contiguous or otherwise. And if bitcoin is about legality we've already lost the ethical battle anyway.
Login to reply
Replies (1)
So you like what Peter Todd does?
BIP110 does not need to be perfect. It needs to reduce the abuse. There are different ways and aproaches to mitigate spam too.
Core devs are compromised. Run your Bitcoin Knots nodes and protect Bitcoin Monetary network.
View quoted note →
View quoted note →
