AI 生成的影片好像不完全（非 100%）都是「垃圾」，各大主流「媒體」似乎有「汙名化」 AI、社群媒體、社交網路 的嫌疑...[註1] 其實拿「減碳」的議題來看就知道，減碳議題其實有一大部份基本上就是假的。[註2] 有錢能使鬼推磨，媒體 / 新聞 的內容我現在都是看得十分懷疑... 🔶 註1 🔶 View quoted note → 🔶 註2 🔶 View article →

🔶《商君書》馭民五術 ── 最惡毒的帝王厚黑學 🔶 馭民五術：愚民、弱民、疲民、辱民、貧民。 在中國古代的思想中，法家思想往往被賦予「富國強兵」的實用主義色彩。然而，當「國家機器」運作的唯一目標轉向絕對的權力集中與資源掠奪時，人民便不再是社稷的根本，而成了被精密計算與管理的對象。 後人將商鞅等法家學說的統治邏輯，總結歸納成為著名的『馭民五術』。 🔶 [1] 愚民 🔶 ► 統一思想，封閉民智。政府壟斷教育，讓百姓保持無知，剝奪他們獨立思考的能力。 🔶 [2] 弱民 🔶 ► 國強民弱，治國之道，務在弱民。統治者會刻意打壓民間組織與個人影響力，防止民間形成可以與朝廷抗衡的力量。 🔶 [3] 疲民 🔶 ► 為民尋事，疲於奔命，無瑕顧及他事。 繁重的工作、兵役或無休止的戰爭，讓百姓每天一睜開眼就必須為最基本的生存而拼命，讓人們根本沒有閒暇去思考社會的不公，更沒有精力去組織反抗。 🔶 [4] 辱民 🔶 ► 摧毀尊嚴，製造恐懼，相互猜疑。 破壞人與人之間的信任，不安全感迫使每個人退縮到孤立的狀態，形成「社會的 原子化」，民間失去凝聚力量、對抗強權的集體結構。[註1] 🔶 [5] 貧民 🔶 ► 剝奪餘財，人窮志短。控制社會財富，讓百姓只能維持最低限度的溫飽。 🔶 殺力 ── 五者若不靈，殺之 🔶 如果用盡上述方法，還是有些「桀傲不馴」、「不服管教」的強民或異議分子，最後的手段就是直接用暴力或肉體消滅來解決。 🔶 天下第一禁書，愚民、洗腦、奴性的來源！統治者永遠都不會說的秘密：商君書 🔶 🔶 註1 🔶 懷疑 「詐騙」橫行，即是破壞底層人民間的信任。政府睜一隻眼閉一隻眼的抓，甚至有些更惡劣，政府可能會黑白勾結，玩兩面手法。 另外，這很像現在愈來愈多國家的政府對 未成年人（兒童、青少年）禁用社交網路的作為，但名義上卻說是「保護」青少年。這種以「保護」為名的全面網路管制，是否也在無形中剝奪了新世代的串聯與獨立思辨能力？ View quoted note → #antiexploit_Five_Tactics_for_Ruling_the_People

🔶 Book of Lord Shang (商君書): The Five Tactics for Ruling the People (馭民五術) ── The Most Vicious Imperial Machiavellianism 🔶 The Five Tactics for Ruling the People (馭民五術): Keeping the people ignorant (愚民), weakening the people (弱民), keeping the people exhausted (疲民), humiliating the people (辱民), and impoverishing the people (貧民). In ancient Chinese philosophy, Legalism (法家思想) was often endowed with a pragmatic color of "enriching the country and strengthening the military" (富國強兵). However, when the sole operational objective of the "state apparatus" (國家機器) shifts toward absolute concentration of power and resource plunder, the people are no longer regarded as the foundation of the state, but rather as objects to be meticulously calculated and managed. Later generations summarized the ruling logic of Legalist doctrines (法家學說), such as those of Shang Yang (商鞅), into the famous "Five Tactics for Ruling the People" (馭民五術). 🔶 [1] Keeping the People Ignorant (愚民) 🔶 ► Unifying thought and closing off the people's wisdom (封閉民智). The government monopolizes education, keeps the common people in ignorance, and deprives them of their ability for independent thinking. 🔶 [2] Keeping the People Weak (弱民) 🔶 ► A strong state makes the people weak; the art of governance lies entirely in weakening the people. Rulers deliberately suppress grassroots organizations and individual influence to prevent the formation of any forces capable of contending with the imperial court. 🔶 [3] Keeping the People Exhausted (疲民) 🔶 ► Creating endless tasks for the people so they are exhausted from running about and have no time to attend to other matters. Heavy labor, military service, or endless warfare compel common people to struggle desperately for basic survival the moment they open their eyes each day, leaving them with neither the leisure to ponder social injustices nor the energy to organize resistance. 🔶 [4] Humiliating the People (辱民) 🔶 ► Destroying dignity, creating fear, and instilling mutual suspicion. By undermining trust between individuals, a sense of insecurity forces everyone to retreat into an isolated state, creating the "atomization of society" where the populace loses the collective structure needed to gather strength and resist tyranny.[Note 1] 🔶 [5] Impoverishing the People (貧民) 🔶 ► Stripping away surplus wealth; poverty breaks a person's resolve. Controlling social wealth to ensure the people can barely maintain a minimum standard of food and clothing. 🔶 Depleting people's strength (殺力) ── If the Five Tactics Fail, Eliminate Them 🔶 If all the aforementioned methods are exhausted and there are still unruly or disobedient strong people or dissidents, the final resort is direct resolution through violence or killing. 🔶 The Book of Lord Shang (商君書): Unveiling Ancient China's Ruthless Path to Power and Its Ongoing Suffering 🔶 🔶 Shangjun Shu (Book of Lord Shang / 商君書) on Five Tactics for Controlling the People 🔶 https://www.douyin.com/video/7403376825725963561 (URL of English videos on Douyin (the Chinese version of TikTok)) 🔶 Note 1 🔶 The rampant spread of suspected "scams" effectively destroys trust among the grassroots population. Governments may turn a blind eye while cracking down, or even worse, collude with criminal elements and play a double game. Furthermore, this bears a strong resemblance to the growing trend in various countries where governments ban social networks for minors (minors, children, and adolescents), ostensibly under the guise of "protection". Does this comprehensive internet control in the name of "protection" also invisibly deprive the new generation of their capacity for networking and independent critical thinking? View quoted note → #antiexploit_Five_Tactics_for_Ruling_the_People