Free markets require the ability to appraise value. However the value of Nostr notes is impossible to objectively appraise, just like the value of friendship. When you start paying for these things, you are signalling that you don't care about the less tangible values and you undermine the interaction. That's why paying people to be your friend is not exactly a free market win. Just like paid shills, or people who only talk with you because you agree with them and stroke their ego.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
Yes, that’s well said and it would dismantle the ethical/moral underpinnings of zaps if the exchange were one of symmetrical exchange.
Zaps are, however, not a consensus-based exchange of symmetrical exchange.
Zaps are tips, in the original sense of extra or of excess or of metaphysical ordinance. As tips, zaps evade being patronizing (toxic control and deceptive manipulation) by being unexpected.
Dude, even likes can be patronizing, what do you mean zaps can't be patronizing?