Replies (4)

Its certainly something made harder by not having that opensats grant. We have always produced a lot for unbanked throughout history of the project, and always will, but resources are significantly less now.
I heard one of the reasons for the rejection was opensats team thinking our 200k users are using our demo server (where we charge 5% fee so people dont use), they do not. That number is people running the software themselves. Opensats needs a better appeal and feedback process for applications. An application going into a black box and it being rejected on mistruths, then projects not knowing the reason or being able to defend is wrong, and incredibly disheartening/unmotivating. More transparency is needed.
โ†‘