Because bitcoin core is considering relaxing op_return limits everyone is... <checks notes>... Saying it's too centralized and then talking about using a fork maintained by one person who wants to eat cats and dipped his frozen pizzas in peroxide during covid π
Login to reply
Replies (18)
:PepeLaugh:
Tgats it im buying bcash hahahaha
nostr:nevent1qqsph0cdkt4stw3r5eedypse0lc3l2nlcjeqlwssnu50nyl6mmt69ygpzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucm0d9hx7uewd9hj7q3q8ehvwz3h3eunyytr0lacmu4rm2ml5kespsv278x5whyh6nsqq8gqxpqqqqqqzgh7egy
The state of things π
I'm just saying lots of people did some weird shit at the start of covid.
luke doesn't want to eat cats you dishonest
Ser. 

Sure. In the beginning. He was still recommending hydrogen peroxide 6 months ago
I don't know man. I'm torn in this whole debate. Do you want censorship resistance and a free market or do you want low fees? My first take was like you said, core is too decentralized. My conviction say resistance and freedom but then politics comes in-silenced opposition-and that more than anything leads me to think fuck core. I really need to read into it more but there's so much fuckin homework.
Yeah. I'm not against more implementations. But knots ain't it unless more sane people start contributing on a regular basis, and even that would be a maybe. I'm hoping Libbitcoin will get cleaned up and become easier to run.
Oh and he thinks putting monkey jpegs on the chain is the same as raping someone. This is definitely who I want writing my software.


Why is knots a fork rather than another implementation of the same consensus rules?
Fork of the bitcoin core program. Code fork, not chain fork.
it's an analogy, not an equivalence
the analogy makes sense, doesn't mean it's equally bad
Did you even read what he said in response? He said it IS comparable and not to minimize the monkey jpegs! Set aside the pedestal you've apparently put him on and realize that he's an unhinged person with Aspergers. You want to run software maintained solely by that guy? Who can't even manage his own Bitcoin??
Nice ad hominem attack against the guy who single-handedly gave us segwit and the UASF fork that forced Jihan Wu and other miners to finally accept it after a 2 year struggle.
I bet you still use legacy wallets because you love cats more than good bitcoin code and obviously lack a sense of humorπΈ
He pushes code to straight to main. How's that for ad hominem? Go ahead and run code maintained by one guy, cause that really helps with decentralization. He's CTO for a Dorsey company and his pinned tweet is still him begging for community support. Dude couldnt even secure his own bitcoin and then begged FBI for help, not to mention he has actively worked against L1 privacy. That's the character of the person we're talking about.
I don't know what you're on about with the cats, but I've clearly touched a nerve. Run whatever software you want but don't act like you're saving Bitcoin by running knots.
I didn't put him in a pedestal, he is clearly a capable individual
now the cat story can't be true, that screenshot must be edited
Dude, go look. It's still up. Click his profile, click the magnifying glass and search it yourself.