There's nothing wrong with defending a child molester. We pay lawyers to defend child molesters all the time using our tax dollars. Having people defend child molesters is very important for the integrity of our justice system and the verifiability of our verdicts against those child molesters. There is a big difference between defending a child molester and defending child molestation itself. There are a million ways someone can defend a child molester without saying anything at all about whether child molestation is good or bad. Are these recent talking points the new strain of Trump Derangement Syndrome? Or are you guys capable of independent thought? Can you talk about Trump without talking about Epstein? And can you talk about Charlie Kirk without talking about Trump?