It would be a lot easier to stick to the important parts and avoid falling into the trap of misdirection if jackass comments like this were less common: This kind of smoothbrained shit is counterproductive fuel for the dishonest actors on the other side of the argument. They wouldn't be incorrect to point out that these sentiments exist, which is how they legitimize their redirection; but they would be wrong that these sentiments matter to most people on this side. But once the legitimate redirection is achieved nobody cares about the nuance anymore.
For Us And Our Posterity's avatar For Us And Our Posterity
Running Bitcoin repositories isnt something any woman should he doing, period. She should be raising kids and arguing on Facebook like a proper woke mom, not have levers of power over a $2 Trillion cypherpunk money, with a culture she clearly doesn't understand or care about. Saying bitcoiners are dumb rednecks is just insane. I'm so tired of dumb women ladder climbing into, and infiltrating, then ruining, male spaces and cultural spots they could never create, twisting things that are deeply important to millions to satisfy their kindergarten value systems and woke coddling campus culture they're used to. Run your own node so this shrill femoid doesn't destroy bitcoin
View quoted note →

Replies (1)

I get where he's coming from but disagree with the "women should or should not" parts, and would rephrase it as "it would be in their best interest to". But that's not relevant here. To my point, these women are not the root cause of the deterioration, they are just the unwitting part of the toolkit.