The man who has spent years inside a protocol knows where it breaks because he was there when it broke. Claude can help him move faster. It cannot replace him. OpenSats is not funding typing. They are funding people who know things that cannot be prompted for.

Real *Concrete* impact would be nice together with a explicity and/or implict projects that failed to delivered and why (?) so new applicants have practical and pragmatic references. This would also benefit the selection process for OpenSats