That’s a fair criticism. If someone has a shitload of bitcoin to spare they can fake conviction without it feeling like risk. We don’t want a pay 2 win for sure. The nature of the original reply was not to put someone down who’s sending zaps without posting more zaps. I view skin in the game (zaps) as something that’s just more personally interesting to me. I view more zaps here as the language and what’s interesting. If someone is saying they’re gonna fire more zaps and does so that’s just gonna be more interesting to follow. If a post is putting someone down that is sending the currency that props up NOSTR then it needs to be more interesting, credible or of higher quality than dissuading more zaps being sent here. I didn’t get that from the post dissuading anyone from sending zaps.

Replies (1)

So unless you can zap as much as the person you disagree with you shouldn't speak? This is a weird viewpoint to me, and I disagree. I came to Nostr for free speech, not zaps 🤷‍♂️