I've actually just been watching this... a few times. My thoughts are unchanged. BIP-110 or Not BIP-110 is a false dichotomy. I am anti arbitrary-data, but also find BIP-110 highly problematic. A temporary soft fork doesn't work for me because it creates time pressure for a post-110 solution. A good engineer would not sign-off on such a set-up. Another proposal is required, preferably written by fresh people. Jack Kruse overplays his hand in a lot of knowledge areas. I largely agree with @Matthew Kratter but would kill 110 in favour of a permanent soft fork in mid 2027 that has more concensus.

Who told you BIP110 has no consensus: View quoted note →

Someone lied to him. BIP 110 has consensus and support.

It's an epistemological imperative.

It’s curious that my poll shows very similar results.

You are pointing to a scammer's account that impersonates Matt Kratter.

Thx for pointing out. *edited