There is a universe full of evidence that scaling this king of system beyond a certain very low threshold makes it go classical. There is zero evidence that scaling it beyond a that threshold without making it classical is possible. 40 years of qc researching only confirms this. More and more heroic isolation only grinds closer to the ceiling and makes our knowledge of it more precise and certain. Failed attempts to falsify knowledge are supposed to make us more and more certain of it.
Believing in things with zero evidence to even suggest that they might exist is irrational.
All I have asked you for is one piece of scientific evidence that breaking this appearant law of nature, the ceiling, is even possible.
You have none, so you pivot. To speculative engineering ideas. To social proofs. To reframing my position is somehow "comic book" unreasonable.
You are advocating for massive, detrimental and dangerous changes to Bitcoin, based on the unsubstantiated dream of research scientists and investors who are profiting wildly from the hype and have zero results.
If you have evidence, put it on the table.
I'll wait.
