Thread

Zero-JS Hypermedia Browser

Relays: 5
Replies: 1
Generated: 17:14:34
Scaling Bitcoin requires self custody IMO, that's a useful technical definition. Similarly, using cashu means using Bitcoin, same as using wallet of satoshi is using Bitcoin, or cashapp. Using a bank account is using Fiat. The bank account isn't fiat either. Same with credit cards. I'm ok if anyone disagreed with that though, since the disagreement has no practical implication. For me this is all sophistry. I don't like arguing about meanings of words with no productive outcome. Let the philosophers do it. As long as we agree on the technical properties of these things, we can find agreement on a deeper level IMO.
2025-10-25 09:32:22 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent 1 replies ↓
Login to reply

Replies (1)

To come back to the example of CashApp: My definition of “using bitcoin” is when a transaction happens on lightning or on chain. So CashApp-to-CashApp is not using bitcoin since I assume it’s just a database transaction. However, I would consider CashApp to any other lightning node or vice versa “using bitcoin”, yes, even if the other entity is also a custodial service. So yes, you can use bitcoin with cashu as long as an actual transaction happens on the network. So mint and melt, but not swaps.
2025-10-25 15:55:47 from 1 relay(s) ↑ Parent Reply