I beg to differ Privacy needs to be fought for constantly despite the temptation and convenience etc of non privacy options This Ben Franklin quite says it quite well: "Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

Replies (1)

I am not sure we differ that much. Privacy is indeed something that needs to be fought for constantly. It is mostly a political battle regarding *laws* and it is fought using *philosophical* reasoning. Not technology. Technology in itself is neutral. With the right legal framework, backed by the right philosophy, eID can be a force for good. We should focus on spreading the correct philosophy and less trying to fight technology
โ†‘