Default avatar
ihsotas 3 months ago
You can store 4mb max every ten minutes so all you can do is small amounts of storage. That’s my whole point. It is a piss poor network for storage of data illegal or otherwise. This doesn’t require a point by point take down. No one would use bitcoin for any sort of systemic data storage system, at best you get graffiti or attacks on Bitcoin hoping to get the chain to fork or become compliant…this is what we are seeing now with bip-444. Fake addresses can host images just like op return. Fake addresses bloat the utxo set and are worse for the chain. This behavior cannot be stopped and can create images of unlimited size, so every fear mongering statement you just made should be reason for you to sell your bitcoin. In reality there is no legal threat to bitcoin without significant refactoring of laws. This is why your political messaging should lean to be inclusive as often as possible and why bashing suit coiners is counter productive. We want all allies we just want to be clear that you can’t change bitcoin(for example you can’t roll back the chain because a block contains transactions you don’t like).

Replies (1)

So because it's not good for the >4MB files you want to store, the hundreds of GB of small files already stored don't matter? Most of this was done after Taproot enabled the inscriptions hack and before v30, let alone BIP-444. I agree with the UTXO bloat being a problem, which is why I support Knots and BIP-444. Core doesn't fix inscriptions hack, it just offers a new place to store data. None of this non-monetary data is necessary for Bitcoin to be used as a P2P Electronic Cash System. I have no problem with Suitcoiners, only Shitcoiners trying to turn Bitcoin into Bithereum. #Enshitcoinification