Its not black and white. It depends whether the UASF has relevance and incentive to the larger Bitcoin community including, node runners, hodlers, miners, economic nodes. BIP-110 is valuable for miners because Bitcoin's value is being Freedom Money. The DeFI use cases, the web3 use cases, the inscription spam use cases devalue Bitcoin. They all go to 0 on Solana, on Ethereum shitcoins, Naka, Citrea etc. Less valuable Bitcoin is bad for everyone including miners. They loose less than 1% if they stop mine spam but their reward will multiply many times when Bitcoin's value in terms of government cuck bucks multiply. And it will multiply if Bitcoin stays Freedom Money because its the best money on planet Earth. We are seeing this for 15 years, except when Core v30 launched.

My read on this is that if a significant percentage of the network doesn’t react to the blatant attacks we’ve seen, it means that the immune system has stopped working and we’ve already lost. Fortunately that doesn’t seem to be true. On the other hand if the significant number of nodes (>14000) and not insignificant hash rate backing them is not enough to exert enough pressure on the industry to back up the counter attack efforts, then the power of the nodes have been diminished over the years due to erosion of culture and changing the narratives. This would be enough to undo any widely held belief that bitcoin is incorruptible and the market will price the change accordingly. I’ll let you ponder on the implications for your lifesavings.