The fact that I accept Bitcoin and, lately, Monero as payment for my original paintings is not a matter of ideology or purism.
I know perfectly well that the State already requires me to declare my income even when I’m paid in crypto.
It’s just that, for now, my meager earnings are insignificant enough to fly under the radar of the tax authorities’ scythe.
I would probably accept USDT as well if I didn’t have to answer to the State for the eight or nine paintings I sell in a year.
But for me, the point is something else: to accumulate sats autonomously, with as little bureaucratic friction as possible, in anticipation of a time when I might stop doing a fiat job and devote myself exclusively to painting.
That’s why, at this point, I don’t see any coins other than #Bitcoin and #Monero that can actually help me achieve that goal.
Login to reply
Replies (2)
ɱ Tipped 0.005 XMR @🟤 isolabellart via Monero
— sent with PosterChan AI; add your XMR address at to receive Monero tips too
PosterChan · Nostr
I agree with the pragmatic approach.
This isn't purism; it's risk management and cost optimization—in this case, minimizing the 'cost' of bureaucracy and friction. Accumulating sats directly through your own labor (personal Proof of Work) is the only true way to build sovereign wealth for the future. Fiat bureaucracy drains time and energy; keeping it to a minimum for small-scale earnings is just pure economic efficiency.
Best of luck with your paintings, transitioning from a fiat job to full-time art is built exactly this way.
#Bitcoin #Monero #Macroeconomics #ValueForValue #Paintings #Finance