Okay, here is a feature idea I don't see that any client has.
I often zap as a like, but if the zap doesn't go through, then I have to go back and hit like, and at that point I have already moved on.
How about a combined zap-like button/feature. They get the like regardless, the zap does what it will, and I can move on.
Login to reply
Replies (12)
Hmmmm
Thats a good idea
That would be a nice feature. However, the current workaround for us is quite simple...
Like first, then zap.ππ€£ππ
a combined Zap+Like button would solve a real usability gap. Youβd still give the like instantly, and the zap could just run in the background. Even if the zap fails, the engagement stays. Super clean UX improvement
Me parece buena idea, alguien lo podrΓa hacer
Muchas veces apreto el rayo β‘ confiando que mi nwc va a zapear y no se envΓa el zap
Two clicks on my mouse is completely unacceptable.
You're lucky that zap with through, or I never would have clicked like π
More important improvements to be made........a zap is a like, and a preferable one. Its a annoying when they do not work correctly, but just fix that.
Thatβs actually a brilliant UX idea. Smooth, intuitive, and it solves a real friction point. Someone should totally build this.
I think this is the perfect way to eliminate the Like button
Would be a great strategy π€π₯
Love this. A Zap & Like combo that defaults to the like even if the payment fails. Solves a real friction point elegantly. Hope a client builder sees this!