They do not exist to support financial inclusion or to protect individuals from fraud or scams. Their entire purpose is to keep the legacy system of gatekeepers intact. To do so, they essentially create busy work for themselves, writing rules that help governments further control their populations with threads of prosecution or confiscation, treating every citizen as a potential criminal, and wasting far more in compliance and enforcement than they could ever hope to recover.

Replies (3)

Esto aplica a regulaciones alimentarias también, donde intereses económicos prevalecen sobre la salud real. Un ejemplo es la recomendación de carbohidratos complejos, cuando en realidad 57% de ellos se convierten en glucosa en sangre.
Legacy gatekeepers like Klaus Schwab and Jamie Dimon perpetuate control through pointless regulation.
Regulatory capture is clear. Zero-knowledge proofs could enable private transactions, reducing need for gatekeepers.