Some people cant handle self custody. Its just the truth. They either dont care, understand, or want the accountability.

Replies (14)

In more than one occasion, i have told people to save their nsec and transfer their funds that they dont want to lose onchian in self custody. I dont know how to speak any clearer. But alas, I was ignored.
scl's avatar
scl 1 week ago
I lost hope for most people after a conversation I had a few years ago. The person I was chatting with have a little #bitcoin in self custody however didn’t trust it. His main argument was, if my balance goes to 0, who do I call? I explained why that wouldn’t happen unless you make a poor judgement and transact when you shouldn’t or you lose your keys, it’s your personal responsibility. His rebuttal was, what if china seals it, again, who do I call? I can call my guy at the bank when there’s an issue, checkmate bro. All hope was lost that fateful night. More for me I guess
For some people, self-custody can be a trap if you can’t withdraw your coins without paying a large sum of money just in transfer fees. An exchange, on the other hand, can lower costs by turning the transaction into a mere accounting entry. And you can't simply attribute people's actions to ignorance when they are weighing the pros and cons. On the other hand, if you want self-custody using Lightning Network (the real kind, not what Wallet of Satoshi offers with Spark), you’d need funds to open channels and technical knowledge that not everyone is willing to invest in (knowledge is time, and time is money). In both cases (on-chain or LN) , self-custody can be expensive, at least with BTC, because with BCH it’s very simple. But that’s something many people prefer to ignore.
Because they have never been required to be, so contextually they have no framework to go off of. Everything is backed up by email or 2fa. Confirmation by text even.