Even Wikipedia appeared to get this wrong... > accused a man of destruction of evidence after he gave his screen lock duress pin to an officer during a border search. Was not evidence, rather destruction of property to prevent seizure.
Final's avatar Final
To say someone is 'suspected of' something is not an indictment or even a credible accusation. The suspect has NEVER been indicted on any other charge except destruction of property to prevent a seizure. Their defence are arguing this to be thrown out given this seizure was done without respect to the suspect's legal rights. I'm not interested in changing my position unless there is a claim with evidence and there is not. You are innocent until proven guilty.
View quoted note →

Replies (4)

I could just edit it? Sure, but supposedly Wikipedia has stringent 'confluct of interest' policies on editing articles about oneself or what you're associated with, so not worth the hassle.
Schnur's avatar
Schnur 2 weeks ago
The sentence looks factual, they just state the accusation.
↑