I just reacted to this. Then I checked out some conversations on youtube about omarchy, checked the doctrine and the link you shared.
And I think in the end it seems to me, that socially not so capable people can be damn genius in building good technical solutions.
These are diferent dimensions.
And I want to look at Omarchy for the goals it stands for. In the end apple does not base its popularity for social traits of the CEO. It is an opinionated predefined system, that offers productivity through making most decisions for the user.
Fritz Haber also foun a way to produce ammonia in a synthetic way, which results in a agricultural revolution and the end of a lot of hunger in the world. And he was called the father of chemical warfare. He created them for the german military in the first worldwar.
In my view, the process on how to cynthesize is still great. Not matter what his opinions and works are besides it.
And the same way Omarchy can be great, while its owner is not to be idealized in other traits. And I think this is also what the freedom in Linux stands for. A war criminal can participate in Linux. And humanrights activists can participate. In linux it is about how well a techvical solution works. Nothing else.
But clearly maby there are communities, where one would not like to participate in.