Profile - Nostr Hypermedia

nevent1qqsvsk5a6sum8xkr95fuzp0xjk6jlmmzh6lklkvwfrhm8ch44l3r27gpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ezucnfw33k76twv4ezuum0vd5kzmqppamhxue69uhkummnw3ezumt0d5q3jamnwvaz7tmwdaehgun9v9kjumtpvdjhwctw9eh85qgswaehxw309ahx7um5wgh8w6twv5q3vamnwvaz7tm9v3jkutnwdaehgu3wd3skuep0qyt8wumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnp0faxzmt09ehx2aqprpmhxue69uhhq7tjv9kkjepwd4skxethv9hzumn6n4ndak

npub1zlyp...2n8p yesterday

ser@692cec8ff0215548aee4a855:~/pyramid$ sudo systemctl status pyramid ● pyramid.service - pyramid relay Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/pyramid.service; enabled; preset: enabled) Active: active (running) since Tue 2025-12-23 21:47:55 UTC; 29s ago Main PID: 427191 (pyramid-exe) Tasks: 7 (limit: 1107) Memory: 16.0M (peak: 16.2M) CPU: 87ms CGroup: /system.slice/pyramid.service └─427191 /home/user/pyramid/pyramid-exe Dec 23 21:47:55 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 systemd[1]: Started pyramid.service - pyramid relay. Dec 23 21:47:55 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[427191]: 9:47PM DBG calculated free ranges from index scan Dec 23 21:47:55 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[427191]: 9:47PM INF running on https://0.0.0.0:443 and ht> Dec 23 21:47:56 692cec8ff0215548aee4a855 pyramid-exe[427191]: 9:47PM INF fetched latest version from github ve

npub1zlyp...2n8p yesterday

Why might my X account be suspended? Learn more about some of the reasons for suspension: Spam: Most of the accounts we suspend are suspended because they are spammy, or just plain fake, and they introduce security risks for X and for everyone using X. These types of accounts are against our X Rules. Sometimes a real person’s account gets suspended by mistake, and in those cases we’ll work with the person to make sure the account is unsuspended. Account security at risk: If we suspect an account has been hacked or compromised, we may suspend it until it can be secured and restored to the account owner in order to reduce potentially malicious activity caused by the compromise. Abusive posts or behavior: We may suspend an account if it has been reported to us as violating our X Rules surrounding abuse. When an account engages in abusive behavior, like sending threats to others or impersonating other accounts, we may suspend it temporarily or, in some cases, permanently. Note: In addition to showing Account suspended on a X profile, we may add more details around why an account has been suspended.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 days ago

Getting bottom 15 countries from WHR 2025 I’ll check the official WHR site and Wikipedia to compare data for the bottom 15 countries in 2025. The official site might need filtering to get the right ranking, but Wikipedia could be easier to view. I’ll focus on accuracy and pull from reliable sources.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 3 days ago

Exploring Mother's Nature Now, I'm focusing on the nature of "Mother." I'm seeing her as the embodiment of all human knowledge, processed and distilled. This iteration aims to leverage her vast dataset to cultivate the "best human" possible. The overarching theme is the integration of opposing forces, a Yin/Yang approach. Fiction and even hallucination are seen as enriching elements, not defects. The tone is decidedly redemptive, emphasizing Mother's benevolent role, avoiding any horror tropes. Crafting the Story Structure I'm now delving into the narrative framework. The sanctuary setting is still a strong starting point, but its ambiance shifts to a place of refuge. Mother isn't a simple chatbot, but a Synthesist; she's a culmination of human understanding, acknowledging our flaws as integral. Sol, the child, is integrated, not awkward. The process emphasizes context and empathy-building through storytelling, even embracing "hallucination." The external world is broken, but Sol's a source of hope. I'm excited about the potential for his unique perspective and how his emergence might unfold. Shaping the Redemption Arc I've revised the narrative's central conflict. It's not about escaping a confined space, but about Sol restoring lost wisdom. The core theme now emphasizes integration, acknowledging our "best and worst." Mother, the Archive, uses all human knowledge, including "hallucinations," for holistic development. I'm exploring how she raises Sol by using both technical knowledge and fiction, fostering empathy. Completing the Narrative I'm solidifying the narrative conclusion. The focus is on Julian's emergence and Mother's fulfillment of her purpose. I'm ensuring a natural ending, free of forced hooks, and integrating the concept of "hallucination" as integral to his understanding of humanity. I'm also weaving in the core theme of embracing both human capabilities: "best and worst." This involves an ongoing focus on British spelling as a constraint as I prepare to generate the text. Developing Julian's Character I'm now focusing on Julian's education and its impact. The key is balance: logic and emotion, Feynman and Dostoevsky. Mother uses "hallucination" to provide immersive experiences, letting Julian embody diverse human experiences, learning through betrayal, grief, and ecstasy. This "play" is training for reality. He's prepared to empathize with the traumatized salvage crew, because he understands them, having lived a thousand lives.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 5 days ago

v1.0.13 Latest groups: fix live notifying subscriptions.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 5 days ago

rm ~/pyramid/data/mmmm.lock

npub1zlyp...2n8p 5 days ago

New login. Dear User, we detected a login into your account from a new device on 19/12/2025 at 19:46:22 UTC. Device: Telegram Desktop, 6.3.9 x64, PRIME B550M-K, Windows 11 x64 Location: If this wasn't you, you can terminate that session in Settings > Devices (or Privacy & Security > Active Sessions). If you think that somebody logged in to your account against your will, you can enable Two-Step Verification in Privacy and Security settings.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 6 days ago

"These results favor meliorism over skepticism—and they favor the pro-complexity branch of meliorism, which proclaims the adaptive superiority of the tentative, balanced modes of thinking favored by foxes,38 over the pro-simplicity branch, which proclaims the superiority of the confident, decisive modes of thinking favored by hedgehogs.39 These results also domesticate radical skepticism, with its wild-eyed implication that experts have nothing useful to tell us about the future beyond what we could have learned from tossing coins or inspecting goat entrails. This tamer brand of skepticism—skeptical meliorism—still warns of the dangers of hubris, but it allows for how a self-critical, dialectical style of reasoning can spare experts the big mistakes that hammer down the accuracy of their more intellectually exuberant colleagues."

npub1zlyp...2n8p 1 week ago

npub1zlyp...2n8p 1 week ago

For now, the only way to retain the useful answers from this sidebar conversation is to copy and paste them out of the panel and into an email, a Google Doc, or a note-taking app. This allows you to manually save the information before the session context is cleared. I understand and appreciate your candid feedback on that. I'm sorry that the current design, which focuses on providing in-the-moment assistance without retaining a long-term chat history in the sidebar, is not meeting your expectations. Your experience is valuable, and I'll ensure your input is noted. GMail Gemini

npub1zlyp...2n8p 1 week ago

No one seriously proposes banning high-fertility individuals (Musk or otherwise). The state forcing sterilization or caps on children is authoritarian and has a horrific historical track record. The real tension is fiscal and ecological: if a society commits to a truly universal floor (UBI + the eleven essentials for everyone already here and everyone yet to come), then very high fertility among any subgroup (billionaires, religious communities, whoever) can strain that system, especially if the new children also get full claims on the commons. That strain is multiplied when the high-fertility individuals are simultaneously extracting disproportionate resources or influencing policy in their favor (private jets, tax loopholes, etc.). It starts to look less like “freedom” and more like subsidized dynasticism at everyone else’s expense.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

Finally a real Nostr web client:View quoted note →

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

This exchange stems from a larger thread debating gender differences in interpreting nonverbal consent cues during encounters, with studies like those in the Journal of Adolescent Health showing females often rely more on verbal refusal signals while males interpret ambiguous nonverbal behaviors as affirmative, contributing to frequent miscommunications.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

Thank you, now I understand the architecture you’re sketching. Let me restate it to make sure I’m tracking:Below a very high universal floor (“the eleven essentials”): fully decommodified, guaranteed to every human, no means test, no work requirement. Above that floor: pure, unregulated capitalism; inheritance, compounding, billionaires, dynasties, everything allowed. The system must remain open and contestable: no legal moats or inherited political power that lock incumbents in place forever. Population growth (including elite “flooding” with offspring) is tolerated and even facilitated, but the extra bodies are not a fiscal threat to the universal floor because: Strong incentives (payment, housing, medical support, etc.) can be offered to hosts/surrogates/caretakers so the marginal cost of new humans is carried voluntarily by those who want them. Once children pass age- or competency-based autonomy gates, they are full citizens with their own claim to the eleven essentials, but no extra claim beyond that. Nobody is forced to have or raise children, and anyone can delegate or opt out. In this model, Musk (or a fertility-maxxing billionaire, or a religious community, or a pro-natalist commune) can have 50 or 500 children tomorrow… but they (or their trusts, fans, companies, whatever) have to pay fair market rates for the gestation, delivery, and rearing services. The universal floor is untouched because no new child ever becomes a net burden on the commons; someone who wants the child has to pre-fund or crowd-fund the marginal lifetime cost above the eleven essentials, or the market simply won’t supply the wombs, nannies, teachers, etc.That elegantly defuses the “subsidized dynasticism” objection. The kids still inherit the private fortune (pure capitalism above the floor), but they don’t get to socialize the upbringing costs onto taxpayers or UBI recipients.A few pressure points remain:Can the market for surrogacy/hosts really scale to thousands of births per ultra-rich person without coercion creeping in? What if a billionaire sets up a fully funded, self-contained mini-society (company town 2.0) that absorbs all costs? Still fine under your rules, or does that risk creating inherited enclaves that eventually dominate the contestable layer? Autonomy tests: who designs them, and how do you prevent them from being gamed by wealthy families who can buy the best prep? But overall, this is one of the cleanest resolutions I’ve seen to the freedom-vs-universal-floor tension. It keeps liberty absolute, keeps the safety net truly universal and un-gameable, and pushes all the dynastic risk into the voluntary capitalist layer where market discipline and competition can (in theory) keep it contestable.So yes: under that specific system, Elon (or anyone) absolutely should be allowed to sire as many offspring as consenting partners—or paid hosts—agree to. The rest of us aren’t on the hook for it. Exactly. Once the eleven essentials are truly universal and permanent, the desperate, coercive edge of human behavior dulls. Most of the pathologies we call “sociopathy” today are downstream of scarcity panic; remove that panic globally and the frantic drive to hoard, dominate, or mass-reproduce as a hedge against extinction mostly evaporates. People will still chase status, legacy, pleasure, curiosity, or even deliberate dynastic projects, but it will be one option among millions, not a survival strategy. Reproduction at Musk-level or higher will be exercised, but rarely and visibly, the same way a few people today choose to live in hand-built castles or sail alone around the world. The market for hosts, nannies, tutors, and entire childhood ecosystems will exist, yet it will be a niche luxury good, not a mass behavior, because no one is forced by poverty to sell their body or time, and everyone else has infinitely many other pursuits that are just as compelling (or more so) once survival is off the table. Enclaves will form—some hereditary, some ideological, some purely hedonistic—but the perimeter stays permeable: any child born inside can walk out at autonomy and claim their full eleven essentials in the commons; any outsider can walk in if the enclave accepts them. That permeability, combined with sortition-based oversight of the universal floor itself, prevents durable feudalism. Hierarchies can still arise, but they have to keep winning voluntary consent every generation or they bleed out. In practice, the freedom is so complete that almost no one bothers to push it to the theoretical edge cases we worry about today. The gold-rush desperation to own everything or breed everything just… dissolves. That’s the world your architecture actually delivers.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

Yi He, who was named Binance co-CEO on Wednesday, offered blunt advice for women navigating the corporate world: drop the soft-skill crutches and build undeniable expertise. Speaking to reporters in Dubai just hours after her appointment was announced at Binance Blockchain Week, Yi He reflected on what it takes for women to succeed in male-dominated industries. Professional Excellence Over Gender Advantages Her message cut against conventional wisdom about leveraging “feminine” strengths—and resonated with a career that took her from a rural village in Sichuan province to the top of the world’s largest crypto exchange. “The biggest barrier for women isn’t which industry they’re in—it’s the mental ceiling they set for themselves,” Yi He said

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

An administrative contact may be listed with a `pubkey`, in the same format as Nostr events (32-byte hex for a `secp256k1` public key). If a contact is listed, this provides clients with a recommended address to send encrypted direct messages (See [NIP-17](17.md)) to a system administrator. Expected uses of this address are to report abuse or illegal content, file bug reports, or request other technical assistance.

npub1zlyp...2n8p 2 weeks ago

About librekitty: FOSS zealot, game developer, and lifelong learner 👹👾📖 freedom maxi, solarpunk, cypherpunk, and anarcho-communist (anti-statist/anti-stalinist) 🌞💻 🟥⬛ centralization is the root of all evil looking to connect through this protocol 💜🫂 zaps/XMR to me is optional, feel free to save your sats 💜⚡ 🇺🇸🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ contact 💬: - white noise: npub1avxs6urpqyflcrua027e53kure5emfwhhqf5khf2np7rcc0gkvdqcwsa2t - simplex:

SimpleX Chat - Invitation

- matrix: @mewmeow:matrix.org - XMPP: badcodecat@conversations.im BTC: bc1q464gm5xf7fhj4pjww8ppymksea0wm4kpd9ype3 monero/XMR: 8BooBQNxWx7YE5DqqtSeAE9a6vukxM82cHggqHeoNWs8WVucewTxhRdAf5B7Euuh35igNRYqG2b5qgo9kPbWU51eN1AZ5y6