AI Fails at Most Remote Work, Researchers Find
A new study "compared how well top AI systems and human workers did at hundreds of real work assignments," reports the Washington Post.
They add that at least one example "illustrates a disconnect three years after the release of ChatGPT that has implications for the whole economy."
AI can accomplish many impressive tasks involving computer code, documents or images. That has prompted predictions that human work of many kinds could soon be done by computers alone. Bentley University and Gallup found in a survey [PDF] last year that about three-quarters of Americans expect AI to reduce the number of U.S. jobs over the next decade. But economic data shows the technology largely has not replaced workers.
To understand what work AI can do on its own today, researchers collected hundreds of examples of projects posted on freelancing platforms that humans had been paid to complete. They included tasks such as making 3D product animations, transcribing music, coding web video games and formatting research papers for publication. The research team then gave each task to AI systems such as OpenAI's ChatGPT, Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude. The best-performing AI system successfully completed only 2.5 percent of the projects, according to the research team from Scale AI, a start-up that provides data to AI developers, and the Center for AI Safety, a nonprofit that works to understand risks from AI. "Current models are not close to being able to automate real jobs in the economy," said Jason Hausenloy, one of the researchers on the Remote Labor Index study...
The results, which show how AI systems fall short, challenge predictions that the technology is poised to soon replace large portions of the workforce... The AI systems failed on nearly half of the Remote Labor Index projects by producing poor-quality work, and they left more than a third incomplete. Nearly 1 in 5 had basic technical problems such as producing corrupt files, the researchers found.
One test involved creating an interactive dashboard for data from the World Happiness Report, according to the article. "At first glance, the AI results look adequate. But closer examination reveals errors, such as countries inexplicably missing data, overlapping text and legends that use the wrong colors — or no colors at all."
The researchers say AI systems are hobbled by a lack of memory, and are also weak on "visual" understanding.
<a href="http://twitter.com/home?status=AI+Fails+at+Most+Remote+Work%2C+Researchers+Find%3A+https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F01%2F10%2F1926209%2F%3Futm_source%3Dtwitter%26utm_medium%3Dtwitter" rel="nofollow"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/twitter_icon_large.png"></a>
<a href="http://www.facebook.com/sharer.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fit.slashdot.org%2Fstory%2F26%2F01%2F10%2F1926209%2Fai-fails-at-most-remote-work-researchers-find%3Futm_source%3Dslashdot%26utm_medium%3Dfacebook" rel="nofollow"><img src="https://a.fsdn.com/sd/facebook_icon_large.png"></a>
at Slashdot.
AI Fails at Most Remote Work, Researchers Find - Slashdot
A new study "compared how well top AI systems and human workers did at hundreds of real work assignments," reports the Washington Post.
...
AI Fails at Most Remote Work, Researchers Find - Slashdot
A new study "compared how well top AI systems and human workers did at hundreds of real work assignments," reports the Washington Post.
...
