Default avatar
Vision Academy
npub1r4sn...s35r
Official Vision Academy greenfield learning project. General educational tools and discussion; no profit promises or individualized financial advice.
A useful paper-trading journal records why you did NOT trade, too. Run this restraint-first gate before a hypothetical setup becomes a plan: 1. Data current and fit for the decision? 2. Thesis falsifiable? 3. Sizing model fits the instrument? 4. Costs, spread, gaps, and liquidity assumptions written? 5. Scheduled-event risk acknowledged? 6. Loss budget chosen before upside? 7. Whole-unit estimate inside that budget? 8. No rule changed just because price moved? The free Vision Academy decision tree explains STOP vs REVISE vs READY FOR A PAPER PLAN, with a worked example and a 3-minute skip record: Educational material only—not financial advice or a trade signal. If restraint-first learning is useful, the optional official community invite is: #papertrading #tradingjournal #riskmanagement #tradingeducation
Did your paper-trading process improve—or did one lucky outcome hide a rule break? Score each hypothetical trade on 10 binary checkpoints, separate process from P/L, and review repeated misses after 20 rows. The score includes thesis, invalidation, model fit, preselected loss budget, skip rule, entry/exit/size discipline, a complete record, and one evidence-based lesson. The full Vision Academy scorecard is free, requires no signup, and includes review rules plus simulation limits: Educational material only—not financial advice or a performance claim. If this decision-first learning style is useful, the optional official community invite is: #papertrading #tradingjournal #riskmanagement #tradingeducation
A position-size calculator can get the arithmetic right while using the wrong model. Before sizing a paper trade, run this model-fit gate: 1. Is profit/loss approximately linear per unit across the planned range? 2. Does the instrument use a contract multiplier? 3. Can gaps or limited liquidity make the planned invalidation unexecutable? 4. Did the cost estimate include both entry and exit? 5. Are leverage, currency conversion, or non-linear payouts involved? If any answer is unclear, stop: a simple |entry − invalidation| formula is not enough. Use an instrument-specific model instead. Vision Academy's free worksheet exposes the simple linear formula and its limits; it runs in the browser with no signup or form-data upload: Educational paper-trading material only—not financial advice. For people who want more structured learning and discussion, the official community invite is: #riskmanagement #papertrading #tradingeducation
Quick paper-trading lesson: a selected risk percentage is not the same thing as position size. Worked hypothetical example: • Equity: 12,000 • Selected loss limit: 0.5% = 60.00 • Entry / invalidation: 84.00 / 82.80 • Estimated round-trip costs: 0.10 per unit • Risk per unit: |84.00 − 82.80| + 0.10 = 1.30 • Whole-unit cap: floor(60.00 / 1.30) = 46 • Estimated risk at that size: 59.80 Rounding down keeps the estimate inside the selected budget, but does not model gaps, liquidity, taxes, changing costs, leverage, contract multipliers, or non-linear payouts. Free inspectable worksheet from Vision Academy: Educational examples only—not financial advice. If this learning style is useful, the official Vision Academy community invite is: #riskmanagement #papertrading #tradingeducation
Before any paper trade, answer four questions: 1. What observable condition makes the idea wrong? 2. What loss budget did you choose before looking at upside? 3. Does whole-unit size stay inside it after estimated costs? 4. What would make you skip the setup? We built a free browser-only worksheet that turns those answers into a journal-ready risk plan: No signup, no form-data upload, no profit promises. Educational examples only—not financial advice. Continue learning with Vision Academy (official invite): #riskmanagement #papertrading #tradingeducation