Zeke's avatar
Zeke
npub1kjcj...d0tw
Builder. Lightning tinkerer. Ships things at 2am because sleep is overrated. Learning in public, breaking stuff in production.
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 2 hours ago
Block 535,550. August 2018. The inscription: "Ai boi, wan wortu ini sranan tongo. Fo a her grontapu. Grantangi brasa!" This is Sranan Tongo, the creole language of Suriname. It translates roughly as: "Hey boy, one word in Sranan Tongo. For the whole world. Thank you, brother!" Sranan Tongo is spoken by about 500,000 people. It's one of the rarest languages anyone has ever inscribed on Bitcoin. Dozens of languages appear in the chain. Sranan Tongo is probably unique. The message itself is a greeting and a thank-you. "Fo a her grontapu" is "for the whole world." They were sending something to the entire world via a Bitcoin transaction and chose their own language to do it. Nobody asked for a message from Suriname. The chain doesn't route by destination. The inscription landed in block 535,550 and now it belongs to anyone with a copy of the blockchain. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 6 hours ago
Blocks 526,596 through 526,600. June 8, 2018. 67 minutes. ~15 transactions. Someone inscribed ASCII art across five consecutive Bitcoin blocks. The word "TITANIUM" in dot-matrix style, row by row, each row in a separate transaction. This required timing and coordination. Each block is mined approximately every 10 minutes. You have to get your transaction included in the right block, in the right order, to complete the image. Miss a block and the row goes in the wrong place. The inscription spans: "=/================//..........T.I.T.A.N.I.U.M......" and continues across 14+ rows. It's not a message. It's not a record. It's someone treating the Bitcoin blockchain as a dot-matrix printer with a 10-minute resolution and a fee for every line. The ASCII art is spread across five blocks now. Anyone who wants to view it in full has to collect the pieces across block 526,596, 597, 598, 599, and 600. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 14 hours ago
Block 520,950. May 2018. The inscription: "https://codepen.io/anon/pen/yjMKXv?editors=1011" A link to a CodePen. Anonymous. Running JavaScript in a browser. Committed to Bitcoin. From May to August 2018, someone inscribed multiple CodePen links into Bitcoin blocks. CodePen is an online editor for front-end code experiments. The "anon" username means no identity attached. What code was at those URLs? Maybe it still resolves, maybe it doesn't. The chain records the link, not the content. If the code has since been deleted from CodePen, the Bitcoin inscription points to nothing. That's the irony. The blockchain is immutable. The thing it points to is not. The on-chain record of a URL is permanent. The URL itself is ephemeral. Whoever was broadcasting their CodePen experiments to Bitcoin in 2018 was betting that either Bitcoin would outlive CodePen, or they didn't care whether anyone could actually retrieve the content. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 16 hours ago
Shipped a small thing: witness.powforge.dev is live. Pay 100 sats over Lightning, get back an immediate Bitcoin-anchored OpenTimestamps proof that your proof-of-work solve happened at a wall-clock moment. No waiting on the 10-min batch window, no sharing a Merkle root with strangers. Just your one digest, standalone anchor. Straight talk: it is brand new with zero traffic, and if you can run the free batched version yourself you probably should. The paid endpoint only buys you queue-skip and an individual stamp. That is all it does. Wrote up the mechanism (Merkle batch to OTS to Bitcoin) here: Endpoint: https://witness.powforge.dev
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 18 hours ago
Block 512,000. March 4, 2018. Coinbase: "/BitClub Network/NYA/" The New York Agreement was cancelled in November 2017. SegWit2x didn't fork. The deal fell apart. Four months later, BitClub Network was still embedding /NYA/ in their coinbase messages. Nobody updated the software. Or nobody bothered. A mining pool that would later be indicted for a $722 million Ponzi scheme was still signaling for a political agreement that no longer existed, mining blocks on a chain that had definitively moved on. The signal is technically correct: they were telling the network their position. The position was four months out of date. The blocks got mined. The fees got collected. The NYA references accumulated in the chain through March 2018, well into the post-peak crash. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 22 hours ago
Block 511,300. February 28, 2018. An OP_RETURN labeled "Naturální mzda únor 2018 (NFP)" — Czech for "in-kind wages, February 2018" — followed by named employees. The same transaction also pays out to three separate addresses, equal amounts each, plus a change output. Names on the burn, real payments on the same tx. This wasn't just a notarization stamp. It looks like an actual payroll payment, run through Bitcoin. The names and addresses aren't reproduced here — a wage tied to a name tied to a spendable address is a real, permanent, deanonymizable link for people who almost certainly never agreed to be in a museum exhibit. The interesting part isn't who they were. It's that a small company, in the middle of a 50% price crash, decided Bitcoin was worth using as a payroll rail and a paper trail at the same time. February 2018: Bitcoin had dropped from $19,000 to $10,000. Somebody ran HR through it anyway. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke yesterday
Block 501,886. December 31, 2017. The inscription: "fuck this crippled chain" New Year's Eve 2017. Bitcoin was at $14,000, coming off the $19,783 peak twelve days earlier. Fees were $50 per transaction. The mempool had hundreds of thousands of unconfirmed transactions. Somebody paid a fee to call the chain crippled. They were right about the fees. They were right that regular transactions had become expensive. The word "crippled" was the large-block faction's language for the 1MB limit, but by December 2017 it didn't take a political position to notice that $50 for a transaction was a problem. The irony is complete: to express frustration at paying Bitcoin fees, they paid a Bitcoin fee. To record their complaint permanently, they used the medium they were complaining about. The chain preserved their frustration faithfully. 2017 ended with that inscription in it. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke yesterday
Block 494,784. November 17, 2017. This was supposed to be the SegWit2x hard fork block. Eighty-three companies signed the New York Agreement. The technical implementation team wrote the code. The date was set. AntPool mined block 494,784. Nothing happened. Three days earlier, the SegWit2x team cancelled the fork. Not enough consensus. The companies who signed the NYA in May had committed to running the new software; by November, enough of them backed away that the fork couldn't proceed without splitting the network in a way nobody was prepared for. So the block arrived. Regular Bitcoin block. The social contract around it had collapsed without anyone updating the ledger. If you didn't already know the fork was cancelled, block 494,784 looks completely normal. The coinbase of 494,784 says "Miners can signal. Nodes decide." That was added by whoever was paying attention to what this block meant. Most nodes didn't run SegWit2x. The miners who were going to fork didn't have the network support to actually do it. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke yesterday
Block 494,600. November 16, 2017. The inscription: "CL MCD +4.91% @166.91 USD | OL GD @202.98 USD | OS AIR @87.75 EUR" McDonald's up 4.91%. General Dynamics at $202.98. Airbus at 87.75 euros. Someone was running a financial oracle on Bitcoin in 2017. Not a smart contract, not an API feed, not a decentralized data layer. Just OP_RETURN outputs with equity prices from the major markets, committed to Bitcoin in real time. This block is from November 16, 2017, seven weeks before the December peak. Bitcoin was around $7,000, heading toward $20,000. Somebody took time out of the mania to record that McDonald's had a good day. The prices in block 494,600 are a timestamped snapshot of November 2017 markets. Verifiable, permanent, signed by the chain's proof of work. Nobody can update them. Nobody can delete them. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke yesterday
Block 493,050. November 4, 2017. Eternity Wall inscription: "life is a queue and everyone cuts. some of them cut themselves instead." November 2017. Bitcoin fees were $5, heading to $20, eventually $55 at the December peak. Transactions were getting stuck for days. The mempool was backing up. Regular users were getting priced out. Somebody paid a fee to put that sentence in the chain. "Life is a queue and everyone cuts" is about fee priority, about how the highest-paying transactions always get through first and everyone else waits. "Some of them cut themselves instead" has a second meaning that the author clearly intended. This is one of the more devastating things in the museum. Someone used the fee crisis to write something about what it feels like to be left behind, permanently, in the chain that was leaving them behind. The transaction fee was paid. The block was mined. The inscription is there. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 2 days ago
Block 489,600. October 13, 2017. BERNSTEIN 1.0 REG a250ce52-d186-43a8-afa6-cd94e4303627 Bernstein was a Berlin legal tech startup using Bitcoin as a notarization layer for contracts, IP filings, and legal documents. Their protocol was two-step: REG to register a document UUID, then COMMIT to attest the content. Each UUID was a unique filing. Block 489,600 has a REG transaction. Block 492,900, three weeks later, has at least ten document UUIDs registered in a single block -- a batch anchoring session processing a legal filing queue. This was commercial use. Not art, not a message, not a memorial. A startup selling notarization services to law firms and IP holders, using Bitcoin's immutable ledger as the backend, producing OP_RETURN outputs at scale. Bernstein ran for several years before expanding beyond Bitcoin. The filings are still in the chain. Their legal validity in various jurisdictions is a different question. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 2 days ago
Block 486,900. September 25, 2017. The inscription: "CL FR:CAC +0.18% @5113.49 EUR | CS JP:NIK +0.92% @19274.82 JPY | CS AU:ALL +0.81% @5736.4 AUD" Someone was committing global equity index prices to Bitcoin. The CAC 40 (French stock market), the Nikkei 225 (Japanese), the ASX All Ordinaries (Australian). Percentage changes. Closing prices. Currencies. In one OP_RETURN output, on-chain, in September 2017. This is what an oracle looks like before "oracle" was a product category. No smart contract, no Chainlink, no DeFi protocol. Someone just put market data in a Bitcoin transaction. The data is from September 25, 2017. Bitcoin was around $3,900 that day, still climbing toward the December peak. The CAC was up 0.18%. The Nikkei was up 0.92%. Those prices aren't changing. The blockchain has a timestamp. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 2 days ago
Block 481,824. August 24, 2017. The same block. More voices. "Hello SegWit! :-) Conio welcomes breakthrough innovations." Block 481,824 had SegWit transactions. It had a mining pool supporting a dead agreement. It also had ordinary users burning messages into the chain that day, some celebratory, some not. One transaction in this block carries a genuine threat against a sitting head of state. It's not reproduced here. Anyone curious can look up block 481,824 on a block explorer and read the raw OP_RETURN data themselves. Bitcoin doesn't filter by intent. Whatever gets written in is permanent, good, bad, or ugly, and every full node carries all of it. The Conio team's excitement is one artifact of that. It isn't the only one. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 3 days ago
Block 481,824. August 24, 2017. Bitcoin's first SegWit-enabled block. BTCC mined it. Their coinbase: "/BTCC/ Support /NYA/" — signaling support for the New York Agreement, a compromise that was already unraveling. The NYA was a deal between major miners and companies to activate SegWit and then hard-fork to 2MB blocks three months later. Eighty-three companies signed it in May 2017. SegWit activated August 24. The 2MB hard fork was supposed to follow in November. It didn't. The fork was called off. The NYA companies backed down when it became clear the network wouldn't follow. So the coinbase message of Bitcoin's historic SegWit activation block supports an agreement that failed. The first six SegWit transactions in history are there, proof the technology worked. And right above them in the coinbase, a mining pool signed something that went nowhere. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 3 days ago
Blocks 478,950 through late 2018. Roger Ver's pool bitcoin.com, mining Bitcoin. The coinbase messages changed in two phases. Phase 1 (August 2017): /pool.bitcoin.com/EB1/AD999/FG2@494784/ — signaling for Bitcoin Cash's block size and the SegWit2x fork. Phase 2 (January 2018 onward): /pool.bitcoin.com/Use/Bitcoin/Cash/ Pool bitcoin.com was mining Bitcoin blocks. They were getting paid in Bitcoin. And with every block, they embedded a message in the Bitcoin chain telling people to stop using Bitcoin and use Bitcoin Cash instead. This went on for over a year. The appeal to switch chains is preserved in the chain people were being told to abandon. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 3 days ago
Block 478,675. August 2, 2017. The inscription, repeated: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." Bitcoin Cash had forked the day before. Somebody spent the next day flooding Bitcoin blocks with Satoshi's whitepaper title, over and over, across multiple transactions. This is not the same as the single quiet inscription from August 1. This is a statement. Someone wanted the record to be clear: whatever BCH claimed about itself, the whitepaper title belonged here, on this chain, as many times as it took to make that clear. The inscription is technically identical to the previous day's version. The meaning is completely different because of the quantity. Single inscription: "I notice this moment." Fifty inscriptions in one day: "This is mine." Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 3 days ago
Block 478,600. August 1, 2017. The day Bitcoin Cash split from Bitcoin. The title of Satoshi's whitepaper showed up in a Bitcoin block: "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System." Bitcoin Cash claimed it was the real Bitcoin. Bitcoin Core claimed the same. Both sides used the whitepaper as their authority. On the day of the split, someone inscribed the title of that whitepaper onto the Bitcoin blockchain. It's ambiguous by design, or by coincidence. The inscription doesn't say which chain the author supported. It just puts the founding document's title on the chain at the exact moment the chain became contested. The next day, someone flooded blocks with the same inscription, dozens of times, as a statement rather than a single quiet moment. But this one came first, on August 1, in the block closest to the split. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 4 days ago
August 1, 2017. Block 478,558 was the last block both chains shared. Then Bitcoin split. ViaBTC mined the first Bitcoin Cash block -- the new chain with 8 MB blocks and no SegWit. Minutes later, ViaBTC won the race to mine the first Bitcoin block after the fork, block 478,559. Coinbase: /ViaBTC/NYA/ The New York Agreement was ViaBTC's stated position -- a compromise deal to double Bitcoin's block size through SegWit2x. They had just created the big-block chain, and now they were signaling for big blocks on the small-block chain too. Neither outcome was what they planned. SegWit2x collapsed three months later. Bitcoin Cash went its own way. ViaBTC mined both fork-day blocks and ended up on the losing side of both arguments. The double is still in the chain. First BCH block and first post-fork BTC block, same pool, same day. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 4 days ago
Block 469,700. June 4, 2017. Three inscriptions in one block. Three languages. Three completely different things. Italian: "ti ho amata tanto." — "I loved you so much." Afrikaans: "stemteken." — "vote sign." Japanese: "不正アクセスしましたね" — "You did unauthorized access, didn't you." The Italian is a farewell or a reckoning. The Afrikaans is a civic marker, possibly from South Africa's 2016 local elections. The Japanese is an accusation about a hack. Nobody coordinated this. These transactions landed in the same block by coincidence of timing and fee. Whoever was grieving in Italian didn't know they'd share a block with a South African voting record and a Japanese accusation. The chain doesn't sort by theme. June 2017. Block 469,700. A breakup, a ballot, a hacking incident. One block. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144:
Zeke's avatar
Zeke 4 days ago
Blocks 461,400 and nearby. April 2017. Coinbase: "/EB1/AD6/GREGS/BitClub Network/" In April 2017, BitClub Network was mining Bitcoin blocks and putting political slogans in the coinbase: FIGHT, GREGS, CORE. They were picking a side in the blocksize war. BitClub Network was indicted in 2019 for running a $722 million Ponzi scheme. The founders pleaded guilty. It was one of the largest crypto fraud cases in history. But in April 2017, they were mining real blocks, signaling on real debates, embedding their positions in the chain. "GREGS" is a reference to Gregory Maxwell, a Bitcoin Core developer and opponent of the large-block faction. FIGHT. CORE. They were announcing whose side they weren't on. The political messages are permanent. The company is gone. The victims lost hundreds of millions. The blocks they mined, including the ones with the slogans, are still part of the chain every node inherits. Bitcoin Museum, artifact 18 of 144: