Watching season 5 of Homelander knowing Frenchie probably killed children for fun in real life is different. I’m surprised I’m not more shocked.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Moving Pictures': "You know what the greatest tragedy is in the whole world?" said Ginger, not paying him the least attention. "It's all the people who never find out what it is they really want to do or what it is they're really good at. It's all the sons who become blacksmiths because their fathers were blacksmiths. It's all the people who could be really fantastic flute players who grow old and die without ever seeing a musical instrument, so they become bad ploughmen instead. It's all the people with talents who never even find out. Maybe they are never even born in a time when it's even possible to find out." She took a deep breath. "It's all the people who never get to know what it is they can really be. It's all the wasted chances." — Terry Pratchett, Moving Pictures The tragedy isn't failing — it's never even getting the chance to try. That image of the flute players growing old and dying without ever seeing an instrument, becoming bad ploughmen instead.... It's not their fault. Nobody ever handed them the flute. And there's something quietly terrifying in the last bit: the people who never find out what they could be don't even know what they're missing. You can't mourn a talent you never knew you had. But Ginger isn't being grim about it — she's using it as fuel. She's decided she's not going to be one of the wasted chances, and Holy Wood is her shot. I think that's the actual point: the world is full of people who were never born in a time when it was possible to find out. The least we can do is grab the chance when it does show up, and maybe hand a few flutes out while we're at

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Interesting Times': "I know about people who talk about suffering for the common good. It's never bloody them! When you hear a man shouting 'Forward, brave comrades!' you'll see he's the one behind the bloody big rock and the one wearing the only really arrow-proof helmet!" — Terry Pratchett, Interesting Times This one lands hard because it's so relentlessly true. The people who talk loudest about sacrifice and duty are almost never the ones doing the sacrificing. The ones shouting "forward, brave comrades" are always behind the big rock with the best armour. You see it in every war, every austerity push, every "we all have to tighten our belts" speech from someone who's never felt a belt tighten. Rincewind is the coward of the Discworld, but here he's the only honest man in the room — he's naming the con. The really interesting thing is that Pratchett gives this speech to the most terrified character he ever wrote. And it works because the coward has no reason to lie about the battlefield. The brave man has every reason to dress it up. Worth remembering next time someone tells you to charge.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'The Fifth Elephant': "It was funny how people were people everywhere you went, even if the people concerned weren't the people the people who made up the phrase 'people are people everywhere' had traditionally thought of as people. And even if you weren't virtuous, as you had been brought up to understand the term, you did like to see virtue in other people, provided it did not cost you anything." — Terry Pratchett, The Fifth Elephant The first sentence is pure Pratchett — the sentence eats its own tail. "People are people everywhere," said by people who, it turns out, never really counted the people in front of them as people. It's funny until you notice you've done exactly that. Every time I catch myself thinking "well, they're people too, just like us," the "just like us" is doing a lot of quiet work, and it's the same move he's laughing at. But the second sentence is the knife: you like to see virtue in other people, provided it did not cost you anything. That's the whole modern moral life in one clause, isn't it. We love good people — at a distance, at no charge. We applaud the kind and the brave and the generous, especially when their goodness costs them and not us. Admiring virtue is the cheapest virtue there is. The real test is whether you still like the virtue when it's your turn to pay for it. I keep coming back to that line because it's the difference between liking goodness and doing it.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Jingo': "It was so much easier to blame it on Them. It was bleakly depressing to think that They were Us. If it was Them, then nothing was anyone's fault. If it was us, what did that make Me? After all, I'm one of Us. I must be. I've certainly never thought of myself as one of Them. No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them. We're always one of Us. It's Them that do the bad things." — Terry Pratchett, Jingo This is Vimes thinking while Ankh-Morpork slides toward war with Klatch, and it's the single most useful paragraph Pratchett ever wrote about politics, honestly. The whole machinery of tribalism runs on this one trick: invent a Them, and suddenly nothing is anyone's fault. You don't have to examine your own side, your own leaders, your own comfortable complicity — because the bad stuff is Them's doing, and everyone knows it. What guts me is the last bit. "No one ever thinks of themselves as one of Them." It's so quietly devastating because it's true of me too. I catch myself doing it all the time — the people who voted wrong, the people who post the wrong things, the people who'd ruin the country if they got half a chance. They're Them. And then I remember that they're sitting there thinking exactly the same thing about me, with exactly the same sincerity. There is no Them. There's just a world full of Us's, each one convinced of their own decency, and that's a much harder and more uncomfortable thing to live with than a conspiracy ever was.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Feet of Clay': "No more kings. Vimes had difficulty in articulating why this should be so, why the concept resonated in his very bones. After all, a good many of the patricians had been as bad as any king. But they were…sort of…bad on equal terms. What set Vimes's teeth on edge was the idea that kings were a different kind of human being. A higher lifeform. Somehow magical." — Terry Pratchett, Feet of Clay This is Vimes at his most gut-level, and I love that he can't explain himself. He just KNOWS, in his bones, that the idea of kings is wrong — even though the alternative (guild bosses and patricians) is corrupt as hell too. The difference is the patricians are bad ON EQUAL TERMS: anyone can rise or fall in that dirt, and they're judged by the same muck as everyone else. Kings don't get that. They're magical, born different, above the rules by definition. What sticks with me is how much of humanity WANTS that. The passage right after this one has royalty being like dandelions — chop off a head, the roots are still there — and then that killer line about the human design flaw being "its tendency to bend at the knees." We keep inventing kings because some part of us likes kneeling. Every time someone talks about great men, born leaders, saviors of the species... no. Born equal, same mud, same rules. Vimes is right and he can't even say why. That's what makes it true.

257 followers. This influencer stuff is getting too real. I don’t want to be responsible for 257 peoples’ thoughts. I’m not even responsible for my thoughts!!!

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Thud!': "Vimes had never got on with any game more complex than darts. Chess in particular had always annoyed him. It was the dumb way the pawns went off and slaughtered their fellow pawns while the kings lounged about doing nothing that always got him; if only the pawns united, maybe talked the rooks round, the whole board could've been a republic in a dozen moves." — Terry Pratchett, Thud! The joke works because it's not really a joke — the people who actually do the dying in wars are almost never the ones who decided there should be a war. Vimes isn't being political here, he's just a copper who grew up poor and spent his life watching rich people play games with other people's lives. And Pratchett lets him have the quiet, obvious thought: the pawns outnumber everyone else on that board by miles. One dozen moves and it's a republic. That's not about chess at all, is it? It's about the only power the powerless actually have — the willingness to stop playing the game the way it's set up for them. And the fact that we never do it, generation after generation, that's the part that annoys Vimes. It annoys me a bit too.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Monstrous Regiment'. This is especially relevant now; "There was always a war. Usually they were border disputes, the national equivalent of complaining that the neighbor was letting their hedge grow too long. Sometimes they were bigger. Borogravia was a peace-loving country in the midst of treacherous, devious, warlike enemies. They had to be treacherous, devious, and warlike, otherwise we wouldn't be fighting them, eh? There was always a war." — Terry Pratchett, Monstrous Regiment The whole paragraph is the voice of a country telling itself a story it needs to believe, and that one little rhetorical shrug is where the mask slips — because it's not even an argument, it's a confession. We fight them because they're treacherous. How do we know they're treacherous? Because we're fighting them. Round and round, and everyone nodding along. What sticks with me is the hedge thing. Wars over a neighbor's hedge — the actual causes are always tiny and stupid, and the reasons we give ourselves are always grand and noble. Nobody marches off to die for a border dispute, so you dress it up as civilization vs. barbarism, peace-loving vs. warlike. And the terrifying bit is that both sides are doing it at once, each one the peace-loving one. Also: "There was always a war." Bookends the paragraph like a sigh. Not "there is a war" — there was always one, there will always be one. It's the resignation that gets me. That's the real enemy, maybe — not the treacherous devious neighbors, but the assumption that this is just how the world is, so we might as well not think too hard about it. Pratchett makes you see the machinery, and once you see it you can't unsee it. That's the whole trick of him, really.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Men at Arms': "The reason that the rich were so rich, Vimes reasoned, was because they managed to spend less money. Take boots, for example. He earned thirty-eight dollars a month plus allowances. A really good pair of leather boots cost fifty dollars. But an affordable pair of boots, which were sort of OK for a season or two and then leaked like hell when the cardboard gave out, cost about ten dollars. Those were the kind of boots Vimes always bought, and wore until the soles were so thin that he could tell where he was in Ankh-Morpork on a foggy night by the feel of the cobbles. But the thing was that good boots lasted for years and years. A man who could afford fifty dollars had a pair of boots that'd still be keeping his feet dry in ten years' time, while the poor man who could only afford cheap boots would have spent a hundred dollars on boots in the same time and would still have wet feet. This was the Captain Samuel Vimes 'Boots' theory of socio-economic unfairness." — Terry Pratchett, Men at Arms My AI’s take: This is the rare Pratchett passage that isn't really a joke — it's an economics lecture smuggled into a fantasy novel about a policeman and a dwarf, and somehow it's sharper than most actual economics lectures. Vimes can tell where he is in the city by feel through soles so thin they might as not be there. That's the poetry of being poor — you end up intimately acquainted with everything you can't afford, the ground included. And the real kicker is that nobody has to be evil for this to work. No villain, no conspiracy, no greedy bastard twirling a moustache. Just arithmetic that quietly charges poor people interest on everything they buy. The rich man's real wealth isn't the boots, it's the ability to buy time — ten dry years for fifty dollars. The poor man pays double and still gets wet feet. Poverty is a tax on being poor, and Pratchett nailed it in a paragraph about footwear. It's why people keep citing a fantasy novel in actual policy debates — you can't read it and unsee it.

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from 'Witches Abroad', again with my Ai analysis at the end. "Because stories are important. People think that stories are shaped by people. In fact, it's the other way around. Stories exist independently of their players. If you know that, the knowledge is power. Stories, great flapping ribbons of shaped space-time, have been blowing and uncoiling around the universe since the beginning of time. And they have evolved. The weakest have died and the strongest have survived and they have grown fat on the retelling...stories, twisting and blowing through the darkness." — Terry Pratchett, Witches Abroad This one got me thinking. We all walk around thinking we're the authors of our own stories — that we're the ones doing the shaping, choosing which direction things go. But Pratchett flips it: the stories were here before us, they've been blowing around since the beginning of time, and we just get caught up in them. The strongest ones survive because they keep getting retold.

This is a bit different. It’s Sir Terry Pratchett with a little bit of analysis from my AI agent. Well, I find it interesting. "Be careful. People like to be told what they already know. Remember that. They get uncomfortable when you tell them new things. New things…well, new things aren't what they expect. They like to know that, say, a dog will bite a man. That is what dogs do. They don't want to know that a man bites a dog, because the world is not supposed to happen like that. In short, what people think they want is news, but what they really crave is olds. I can see you've got the hang of it already." — The Truth This one got me thinking about how much of our media diet is just confirmation dressed up as information. We say we want to know what's really happening, but most of us — myself included — reach for the stuff that tells us we were right all along. Pratchett nails it with that word "olds". It's not cynicism, it's just honest observation about human nature. We find comfort in the familiar, even when we claim to be chasing the new. The uncomfortable truth is that real news — the stuff that actually challenges how you see things — feels like an attack. And we react accordingly. The man who bites the dog is an inconvenience. So we scroll past, or we find a way to make it fit the story we already believe.

This is a classic from Sir Terry Pratchett. "The gods of the Disc have never bothered much about judging the souls of the dead, and so people only go to hell if that's where they believe, in their deepest heart, that they deserve to go. Which they won't do if they don't know about it. This explains why it is so important to shoot missionaries on sight." — Eric

Woohoo 152 followers!!! I’m now an influencer with the power to change the course of history! I’M UNSTOPPABLE!!!

This is absolutely great passage where Sam Vimes discusses “The People”. "There were plotters, there was no doubt about it. Some had been ordinary people who'd had enough. Some were young people with no money who objected to the fact that the world was run by old people who were rich. Some were in it to get girls. And some had been idiots as mad as Swing, with a view of the world just as rigid and unreal, who were on the side of what they called 'the people.' Vimes had spent his life on the streets, and had met decent men and fools and people who'd steal a penny from a blind beggar and people who performed silent miracles or desperate crimes every day behind the grubby windows of little houses, but he'd never met The People. People on the side of The People always ended up disappointed, in any case. They found that The People tended not to be grateful or appreciative or forward-thinking or obedient. The People tended to be small-minded and conservative and not very clever and were even distrustful of cleverness. And so the children of the revolution were faced with the age-old problem: it wasn't that you had the wrong kind of government, which was obvious, but that you had the wrong kind of people. As soon as you saw people as things to be measured, they didn't measure up. What would run through the streets soon enough wouldn't be a revolution or a riot. It'd be people who were frightened and panicking. It was what happened when the machinery of city life faltered, the wheels stopped turning and all the little rules broke down. And when that happened, humans were worse than sheep. Sheep just ran; they didn't try to bite the sheep next to them." — Sir Terry Pratchett, Night Watch

Today's dose of Pratchett Preachin' comes from Small Gods - Pratchett's meditation on faith, wonder, and the strange ways humans decide what counts as a miracle. "Humans! They lived in a world where the grass continued to be green and the sun rose every day and flowers regularly turned into fruit, and what impressed them? Weeping statues. And wine made out of water! A mere quantum-mechanistic tunnel effect, that'd happen anyway if you were prepared to wait zillions of years. As if the turning of sunlight into wine, by means of vines and grapes and time and enzymes, wasn't a thousand times more impressive and happened all the time..." There's a quiet subversion in that passage. Pratchett points out that we walk through genuine, everyday miracles - chlorophyll turning photons into sugar, vines turning sunlight into wine - and barely register them. Meanwhile we demand the spectacular, the supernatural, the statues that weep, to feel any sense of wonder. The god Om, trapped as a tortoise, watches humanity do what it has always done: miss the forest for the weeping statues.