Can the Universe branch into countless parallel realities at every quantum event? Why does the Big Bang, governed by unchanging physical laws, eventually give rise to Life that stubbornly survives, spreads, and evolves into intelligent beings? This article explores parallel universes, evolution as a self-rewriting code, and the profound “command to survive” — bridging rigorous science, philosophical inquiry, and the human search for meaning.

mvmrik

Life and Parallel Universes — mvmrik

Can the Universe branch into countless parallel realities at every quantum event? Why does the Big Bang, governed by unchanging physical laws, even...

You can tell the difference between a wise person and a foolish one by their mistakes. The wise person admits them, while the foolish one does not.

Most people who are against Bitcoin don’t understand how it works. They don’t know what decentralized data distribution on the blockchain is. They don’t understand what open source is and don’t know how the code works. Nevertheless, they offer their opinions based on ignorance and argue with experts who know how it all works.

There is one thing that people find very hard to grasp. If you want to have truly uncensorable money and you freeze an account to stop a crime, you turn that money into a tool of control. For truly uncensorable money to exist, we must not be swayed even by the most serious crimes. At first glance, it seems absurd, but that is the price we must pay. Anything else would turn it into a tool of control.

🇧🇬 Small Country, Big Minds: World-Changing Bulgarian Inventions! 🇧🇬 Did you know that some of the most essential parts of modern life were created by Bulgarians? From the tech in your pocket to the safety in your car, Bulgarian genius is everywhere! 🚀 💻 The First Electronic Computer: John Atanasoff (of Bulgarian descent) invented the ABC, the world’s first electronic digital computer, laying the foundation for the entire digital age. 💊 The Birth Control Pill: Chemist Carl Djerassi, who grew up and studied in Sofia, was the leading figure behind the development of the first oral contraceptive. ✈️ The Airbag: Aviation legend Assen Jordanoff created the prototype for the airbag, a life-saving technology now found in every modern vehicle. ⌚ The Digital Wristwatch: Peter Petroff developed the world’s first digital watch (the Pulsar), which was considered a high-tech marvel when it first launched. 🥛 Lactobacillus Bulgaricus: Scientist Stamen Grigorov discovered the specific bacteria that makes yogurt possible. Because of him, the world enjoys this healthy superfood today! Bulgaria may be small, but its contribution to science and global progress is massive. Share this to spread the word! ✨

Has the Lightning Network failed? It used to be easy—I could send payments quickly and instantly with almost no fees. Now I open my Wallet of Satoshi, which I hadn’t used in a few months, and see a message saying I can’t receive payments due to EU regulations. I tried to transfer my funds to another Phoenix wallet and got an error. I installed Breez, and it still doesn’t work—it’s asking for a minimum of 250K sats. Wasn’t the whole point of LN to have lightning-fast transactions with almost no fees, rather than requiring large amounts just to open channels? Maybe I’m missing something, but what’s the point of LN if I want to transfer my funds to another wallet and can’t? Maybe I’ll do an on-chain transfer, but that defeats the whole purpose.

If the old Bitcoin addresses are frozen or something is done to them—whatever it may be—it will mean only one thing. Bitcoin is no longer decentralized and is dead. The very idea of Bitcoin is dead. It no longer exists and cannot be used for what it was created for. Its sole purpose is to create independent and uncensorable money, accessible only and exclusively to its owner. If the network decides to interfere with personal addresses, that will be the absolute end of Bitcoin. All the big whales who have billions in Bitcoin will start wondering whether to keep their money there, because the only reason they do so is that they believe it is the safest place for it. If they see that someone can intervene and freeze addresses, that will be an extremely bad red flag for the entire network and will mean that in the future there could be another reason to freeze their addresses as well. If this freezing happens, I’m done with Bitcoin, and I’m sure many others will do the same. This is our only chance to have truly uncensorable money, and if it’s squandered, there won’t be a second chance like this.

If someone writes about Bitcoin or has Bitcoin in their name or avatar, but badmouths it when the price is down, that person clearly has no clue about the subject and likely created their profile just to spam. I mute them immediately. I don't want to read their posts—real Bitcoiners aren't swayed by emotions and don't think in terms of fiat profits.

The worst opinion is to have a firm opinion.

If someone believes that there will always be greedy and power-hungry people in the world, and that we can't change that, but we can build a system that harnesses their greed and selfishness to make things work—that person is wise and far-sighted. If someone thinks it's possible for the world to achieve harmony, where people live in peace and mutual understanding, and everyone voluntarily helps their neighbor purely for the common good—then they're a naive fool. Look at how Bitcoin was created and how it operates, relying on human selfishness. It compels people to collaborate and contribute to the collective, but they do it for their own selfish gain. If this model were applied to global governance, everything would be better.

Bitcoin has shown resilience post the April 2024 halving, with historical trends indicating bull runs typically peaking 12-18 months later, suggesting potential upside into 2026 despite current consolidation around $110,000. Recent Fed rate cut hints triggered volatility, causing a 2-6% dip amid $800M liquidations and bearish sentiment, with the Fear & Greed Index at 39 signaling fear, though institutional inflows provide counterbalance. Macro factors like U.S. dollar strength and liquidity resets could pressure prices short-term, but normalized leverage and rising on-chain activity point to a rebound; in the near future, expect choppy trading with risks below $100K, while long-term outlook remains bullish toward new highs driven by scarcity and adoption. 🚨 Bitcoin dips 1.6% to around $111,000 after Fed hints at smaller rate cuts. 💥 Crypto traders face $800M liquidations in volatile "sell-the-news" reversal. 📉 BTC plummets 6% post-Fed cut amid Binance dumping fears and data gaps. 😨 October 2025 labeled most cursed month in crypto with lingering market fear. 🔻 Gold falls alongside Bitcoin for fourth day, signaling broader bearish trends. 📊 BTC tests $112K before retreating, supported by whale outflows and 59.3% dominance. 🔮 Eyes on $122K as support holds strong with institutional inflows. For the next week: 📈 Potential rebound to $115K if $108K support holds amid post-Fed stabilization. 📉 Risk of dip to $105K on continued volatility and macro caution. For the next month: 🔄 Range-bound between $105K-$120K as liquidity resets and sentiment recovers. 🚀 Upside to $122K possible with positive on-chain metrics and reduced leverage. For the next year: 🌟 Bullish surge toward $150K+ following historical post-halving patterns and adoption growth. ⚠️ Downside risks to $80K if stagflation persists, but scarcity favors long-term highs. This is not financial advice, but calculations and assumptions that may not come true.

Bitcoin is currently experiencing a pre-FOMC dip, with prices stabilizing around $112,500 after a 1-2% drop in the last 24 hours, influenced by market liquidations exceeding $217 million and broader crypto weakness despite stock market highs. Post-2024 halving trends suggest continued upward momentum into 2025, as historical patterns show price peaks 12-18 months after halvings, potentially amplified by expected Fed rate cuts and improving sentiment shifting from fear to greed. Key factors like ETF inflows, reduced miner pressure, and liquidity hopes could drive short-term recovery, while long-term growth may hinge on macro stability and institutional adoption, projecting consolidation near-term but bullish expansion over the year amid neutral-to-positive market moods. Bitcoin Highlights from the Last 24 Hours 📉 Bitcoin slips 1.2% to around $112,568, marking a standard pre-FOMC pullback amid quiet trading. 🚨 Over $217 million in crypto liquidations stun traders, with Bitcoin and Ethereum leading the downturn. 📊 Market shows weakness defying S&P 500 records, as BTC sinks below $113K in late U.S. session. 🔻 Ethereum drops below $4,000, reflecting broader sector declines tied to Bitcoin's movement. 🛡️ Analysts note dip looks temporary, with $120K path opening if support holds above $110K. Price Expectations Next Week: 📈 Potential rebound to $115K-$118K if Fed cut boosts liquidity and sentiment stays greedy. 📉 Risk of dip to $110K on volatility from FOMC decision. Next Month: 🚀 Climb toward $120K-$125K as post-halving momentum builds with ETF inflows. ⚠️ Consolidation around $112K if macro uncertainties persist. Next Year: 🌟 Bullish surge to $130K-$150K peak, following historical halving cycles and institutional demand. 📊 Average forecast around $138K by end-2025, with upside to $180K on favorable policies. This is not financial advice, but calculations and assumptions that are not guaranteed to come true.

Blockchain analysis shows that 1.5–2 million BTC, mostly from early addresses (2009–2011), have exposed public keys due to transactions. These are vulnerable to future quantum computers with 3000 logical qubits, which could use Shor’s algorithm to derive private keys in hours to days. Such quantum advancements are expected between 2030 and 2050, per IBM and Google roadmaps. Modern HD wallets protect new addresses by generating a new one per transaction, keeping public keys hidden until used. This makes new addresses resistant to quantum attacks. Even current quantum computers like Google’s Willow (105 physical qubits) pose no threat, as they’re far from the required 2000–3000 logical qubits. A quantum-resistant Bitcoin, using post-quantum algorithms (e.g., lattice-based cryptography), will only protect newly created addresses. Old addresses with exposed public keys will remain vulnerable unless funds are manually transferred to new, secure addresses before an attack. These old addresses are likely to be compromised when the technology arrives. Compromising these addresses could cause a market shock, as releasing 1.5–2 million BTC may trigger a sharp price drop, potentially 20–50% or more, due to panic and market flooding. However, this would return coins considered permanently lost to circulation, increasing liquidity. Long-term, this is unlikely to harm Bitcoin. Instead, adopting quantum-resistant cryptography will make the network more secure, and unlocking unused coins will increase the usable percentage of the total supply. This could boost confidence and support Bitcoin’s growth as a more robust and secure system.

Google's Willow, with 105 physical qubits, cannot break a private key from a public key in Bitcoin, as 2000–3000 logical qubits are needed for Shor's algorithm. This makes such an attack impossible with current technology. A quantum computer with 3000 logical qubits could use Shor's algorithm to derive a private key from a public key in hours to days, rendering Bitcoin's elliptic curve cryptography (secp256k1) vulnerable. This threatens addresses with exposed public keys. Modern Bitcoin wallets (HD wallets) counter this by generating a new address for each transaction. The public key remains hidden until the address is used, protecting unused addresses from quantum attacks. Guessing a 24-word seed phrase (256 bits of entropy) with a quantum computer is nearly impossible. Grover's algorithm reduces the search to ~2^128 attempts, but even with 3000 qubits, this would take billions of years. Neither Willow nor a more powerful quantum computer has a practical chance of success. Conclusion: Bitcoin is secure against current quantum computers.

Netflix and other similar services are not entertainment platforms, but tools used as weapons to impose public opinion.