You saw actors on a stage with studio lighting on the tell-a-vision screen! 😆🤡🌎

It's time we all start treating corporations as what they are; businesses. They are not "governments" at all, but literally actors on tell-a-vision programs for corporate gains. People hold all the power of contract over any persons (corporations) and are the very source of the law. #WeAreThePeople #CorporationsAreNotGovernment #ConsentOfTheGoverned #EndTheIllusion #NaturalLaw

This "selfie culture" is the definition of narcissism... Narcissism refers to a personality style or set of traits characterized by an excessive focus on oneself, often at the expense of others. In everyday language and psychology, it describes patterns like self-centeredness, a strong need for attention or admiration, and a sense of being more important or special than others. Just an observation. 🥰 #SelfieCulture #NarcissismDefined #AttentionEconomy #EgoOnDisplay #MeMeMe

Y'all are silly. 🤣😂🤣 Stop playing the legal fiction! #LegalFiction #UScitizen #IncomeTax #FederalEmployees #USCorporation

Stop listening to the #noise and #nonsense #Bitcoin is open source math! ⚡️ Open source refers to software (or sometimes other works like hardware designs, data, etc.) where the source code is made publicly available under specific licensing terms that allow anyone to view, use, modify, and distribute it (including commercially), typically without royalty fees or heavy restrictions. The authoritative standard comes from the Open Source Initiative (OSI), which maintains The Open Source Definition (OSD). According to the OSD, for software to qualify as truly open source, its license must satisfy these core criteria (paraphrased directly from the definition): 1 Free Redistribution — The license must not prevent anyone from selling or giving away the software (even as part of a larger collection of programs) and must not demand royalties or fees for such distribution. 2 Source Code — The program must include source code and allow distribution in both source and compiled forms. If only compiled form is distributed, there must be a clear, low-cost (preferably free via download) way to get the source code. 3 Derived Works — The license must allow modifications and derived works to be distributed under the same license terms as the original. 4 Integrity of the Author’s Source Code — Modifications may be restricted only in ways that preserve the original author’s source code integrity (e.g., requiring modified versions to carry a different name or version number). 5 No Discrimination Against Persons or Groups — No person or group can be excluded from using or distributing the software. 6 No Discrimination Against Fields of Endeavor — No restrictions based on what the software will be used for (e.g., commercial use, military, etc.). 7 Distribution of License — The rights attached to the program must apply to everyone it’s redistributed to without needing a separate license. 8 License Must Not Be Specific to a Product — Rights can’t be tied only to the original distribution; they must follow the software even if redistributed separately. 9 License Must Not Restrict Other Software — The license can’t impose restrictions on other software distributed alongside it. 10 License Must Be Technology-Neutral — No restrictions based on specific technology or interface. These rules ensure the code remains freely accessible and modifiable in perpetuity, promoting collaboration over centralized control. Note that “open source” focuses on practical benefits like transparency, rapid development, and commercial viability, while “free software” (as defined by the Free Software Foundation) places stronger emphasis on ethical freedoms — the user’s right to run, study, share, and improve the software as a matter of liberty (often summarized as the four essential freedoms). In practice, the sets of approved licenses overlap heavily, and many people use the terms interchangeably today. 😎 #opensourcesoftware #nostr #GrowNostr

—The Bible is a Commercial manual in the form of a fable designed by and for bankers. 🏛️ #TheBible #UniformCommercialCode #banking #CommercialLaw #RomanLaw

Did you actually think you were taught the truth in "school?" 😆🤣😂 #ClownWorld #HistoryLies #MainstreamNarrative

Just look at all those seeds! 🤩 #organic #papaya #antiparasitic #fruit

What do you think is going on? 🤔

Who do you think built this one, and how and when? 😳

Fraud happening in real time! 😳

Do you own your #Bitcoin or is someone else holding the private keys? 🧐🔐 WHERE IS BITCOIN, AND WHAT IS IT REALLY? When you claim “I own some bitcoin,” what do you actually possess—especially since no physical or even discrete digital “bitcoins” exist as tangible items? Bitcoin maintains a public, distributed ledger (the blockchain) that records unspent transaction outputs (UTXOs), tracking which amounts are assignable to specific addresses. There are no individual “coins” sitting somewhere; the system simply enforces rules about who can authorize changes to those ledger entries. What you truly control—and therefore own—is the cryptographic private key (or the seed phrase that deterministically generates it). This private key is the mathematical secret that lets you create a valid digital signature to authorize moving value from associated addresses on the ledger. Your wallet software forced you to record those “strange words” (the seed phrase, usually 12–24 words from the BIP-39 wordlist) for a reason: those words represent your private key(s). They are the functional equivalent of your bitcoin. Control the private key, and you can command the ledger to reassign the value to any other address. Lose it (or have it stolen), and that value becomes inaccessible or belongs to whoever now holds the key. For all practical purposes, your private keys are your bitcoin. Possession and control of the key is what defines ownership in this system—there is no other bearer instrument or intermediary asset. If you believe this is exaggerated or incorrect, feel free to send over your private key (or seed phrase), and watch what happens to “your” bitcoin. 😁 #HoldPrivateKeys #SelfCustody #StackSats #PublicLedger #coffeechain #GrowNostr

Old world tech...downtown Denver. 😲

Words have special meanings...🤫

Did you ever see the Vatican coin? 🧐

Police are privately owned security guards for the foreign privately owned corporation called United States and have no obligation to the people. 🇬🇧 #policestate #ForeignCorporation #UnitedStates

Do any of you know what this flag is and which company it belongs to? 🧐

Following of the lights! 🌞

Isn't city life exciting?! 🤩🙄

501(c)(3) organizations are slaves to the Corporation; they must do as they are told, paying tribute to the Vatican. To be tax-exempt under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, an organization must be organized and operated exclusively for exempt purposes set forth in section 501(c)(3), and none of its earnings may inure to any private shareholder or individual. In addition, it may not be an action organization, i.e., it may not attempt to influence legislation as a substantial part of its activities and it may not participate in any campaign activity for or against political candidates. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3) are commonly referred to as charitable organizations. Organizations described in section 501(c)(3), other than testing for public safety organizations, are eligible to receive tax-deductible contributions in accordance with Code section 170. The organization must not be organized or operated for the benefit of private interests, and no part of a section 501(c)(3) organization's net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual. If the organization engages in an excess benefit transaction with a person having substantial influence over the organization, an excise tax may be imposed on the person and any organization managers agreeing to the transaction. Section 501(c)(3) organizations are restricted in how much political and legislative (lobbying) activities they may conduct. For a detailed discussion, see Political and Lobbying Activities. For more information about lobbying activities by charities, see the article Lobbying Issues PDF; for more information about political activities of charities, see the FY-2002 CPE topic Election Year Issues PDF. In Bob Jones University v. United States (461 U.S. 574), the U.S. Supreme Court noted the following about the government’s intended purpose for the 501c3: The Court asserts that an exempt organization must “demonstrably serve and be in harmony with the public interest,” must have a purpose that comports with “the common community conscience,” and must not act in a manner “affirmatively at odds with [the] declared position of the whole Government.” Taken together, these passages suggest that the primary function of a tax-exempt organization is to act on behalf of the Government in carrying out governmentally approved policies. Government Hushmoney IRS Code § 501c3 reads as follows: Sec. 501. Exemption from tax on corporations, certain trusts, etc. (c) List of exempt organizations — (3) Corporations, and any community chest, fund, or foundation, organized and operated exclusively for religious, charitable, scientific, testing for public safety, literary, or educational purposes, or to foster national or international amateur sports competition (but only if no part of its activities involve the provision of athletic facilities or equipment), or for the prevention of cruelty to children or animals, no part of the net earnings of which inures to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual, no substantial part of the activities of which is carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting, to influence legislation, (except as otherwise provided in subsection (h)), and which does not participate in, or intervene in (including the publishing or distributing of statements), any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for public office. One need not look far to see that the church’s acceptance of the 501c3, and its significant restrictions, has had devastating consequences to not only the church, but to the entire nation. When a church accepts the 501c3 status, that church: * Waives its freedom of speech. * Waives its freedom of religion. * Waives its right to influence legislators and the legislation they craft. * Waives its constitutionally guaranteed rights. * Is no longer free to speak to the vital issues of the day. * Becomes controlled by a spirit of fear that if it doesn’t toe the line with the IRS it will lose its tax-exempt status. * Becomes a State-Church. The church in America today is, by and large, not speaking to the vital issues of the day. The church has been effectively silenced. There has been a chilling effect upon the church’s freedom of speech for fear of IRS retribution should the church get out of line. The inevitable result is a moral downward spiral in the culture as the church stands mute. This did not happen by accident, but by design, and it is something of relatively recent design. Churches were added to IRS Code § 501c3 in 1954. All one need do is analyze who is responsible for sponsoring the congressional bill to include churches in § 501c3 and it should become apparent that his agenda was not to empower the church, but to silence the church (hint: the sponsor was a Senator from Texas who later became President).