Solitary Man Neil Diamond Melinda was mine 'til the time That I found her Holding Jim And loving him Then Sue came along, loved me strong That's what I thought Ya, me and Sue But that died too Don't know that I will But until I can find me The girl who'll stay And won't play games behind me I'll be what I am A solitary man Solitary man I've had it to here Bein' where love's a small word Part-time thing Paper ring I know it's been done Havin' one girl who'll loves you Right or wrong Weak or strong Don't know that I will But until I can find me The girl who'll stay And won't play games behind me I'll be what I am A solitary man Solitary man Don't know that I will But until I can find me The girl who'll stay And won't play games behind me I'll be what I am A solitary man Solitary man Solitary man Solitary

Rams won

Evidence: Satoshi’s Environment Was Windows-Native All the Bitcoin 0.1.x releases (January → mid-2009) were Windows-only executables compiled with Microsoft Visual C++ 6.0. The code paths used Win32 APIs, not POSIX. The build instructions assumed Windows NT/2000/XP. Even the GUI (wxWidgets) and installer (.exe setup) were Windows tools. This tells us Satoshi was: Comfortable working inside Microsoft’s ecosystem. Writing C++ at a time when most open-source cryptographers (Hal Finney, Adam Back, Wei Dai) were using Linux or BSD. Not using the GNU toolchain, autoconf, or makefiles. 🧠 2. What That Suggests About Background Your idea that he might have been a mid-level developer from the defense or security world isn’t far-fetched. In the 1990s-2000s, the U.S./U.K. military-industrial and defense-contractor scene (e.g., Raytheon, Lockheed, BAE, NSA subcontractors) commonly: Coded crypto tools in C or C++ on Windows NT for classified networks. Used Visual Studio because it was the approved, supported environment. Focused on deterministic, low-level encryption implementations (no open-source culture). So, a person from that world would: Default to C++ (not scripting languages or UNIX tools). Avoid social exposure (used to NDAs and compartmentalization). View opsec as second nature — matching Satoshi’s extreme privacy. 🧑‍💻 3. Enter Martti Malmi (“sirius-m”) When Martti joined in late 2009: He ported the code to Linux and added autostart/system-tray features. Began hosting bitcoin.org and the original forum. That division of labor is revealing: Satoshi wrote the cryptographic core, networking, and consensus. Martti handled usability, distribution, and cross-platform support. It fits the pattern of an engineer who can architect a secure protocol but doesn’t specialize in open-source release engineering — again consistent with someone from a closed, Windows-centric dev culture. 🔐 4. Language Style and Design Choices The C++ style is “mid-2000s professional”: not academic, not hobbyist. He used manual memory management, header-heavy design, and no external crypto library (he re-implemented SHA-256, base58, etc.). The protocol shows systems-level rigor, but not corporate boilerplate — suggesting an individual engineer with strong applied-crypto literacy. 🧭 5. Plausible Composite Profile Combining these clues, Satoshi could plausibly have been: A security-cleared C++ engineer (mid-career, maybe 30s-40s in 2008). From the defense-tech or financial-systems sector, comfortable with Windows toolchains. Aware of academic crypto papers but operating outside academia. Skilled enough to design the Bitcoin protocol yet modest about GUI/UX or open-source workflows. 🪞 6. Why That Fits the Behavioral Pattern He maintained operational security discipline (no slip-ups in time-zone or typing patterns). He used technical English but with slight British spellings (“colour,” “favour”), perhaps educated in the Commonwealth defense-research orbit. He disappeared once the project became too public — behavior consistent with someone whose day job or clearance forbade high-profile exposure.