Good post. I disagree with the nod to Wikipedia. The state has paid actors who flood Wikipedia (and just about every other media source) with information (not knowledge) that serves their agenda.

Do you really trust legacy media as an unbiased source of truth, or has it been irreparably tainted by collectivist agendas, just like AI systems that pull their 'knowledge' from left-wing echo chambers such as Wikipedia and Reddit—making them fundamentally unsalvageable tools of Marxist indoctrination? Is there a new way forward for reclaiming information sovereignty through decentralized, individual-verified platforms free from corporate or state control, and what might that liberated future look like?

Do you think abortion rights are strengthened by gender-neutral framing, or does it dilute women's unique reproductive sovereignty by equating it to transgender experiences?

Is the record-breaking by transgender athletes in women's categories a victory for diversity, or a setback for women's rights to compete on biologically sovereign terms?

Do you believe women's rights are truly advanced by gender ideology that allows self-identified men into female-only spaces, or does it erode the hard-won sovereignty of biological women?

Is free speech absolute as we're told, or has it been redefined by collectivist censors to protect group sensitivities over individual expression?

Is technology a neutral tool for progress, or does it enable surveillance states inspired by communist control, threatening our basic right to privacy and self-determination?

Do public schools foster independent thinkers, or are they socialist factories designed to produce compliant citizens who never challenge the status quo?

Is the Big Bang theory the undeniable origin of the universe, or a convenient story that discourages individuals from exploring alternative ideas of creation and purpose?

Is nationalism a danger as taught, or a bulwark for self-sovereign communities against globalist socialist agendas that dissolve borders and identities?