ImYour Huckleberry's avatar
ImYour Huckleberry
npub1lme7...d0ae
For the moment, let's leave religion out of this discussion. I will come back to it later. All Humans(people), by nature, have the same rights; not dependent on when, where, how, or what gender they are born. These Rights supersede all national affiliations and national laws. These are natural laws. They existed before there were governments and will remain after. First and foremost, All people own themselves. All people are entitled to the fruits of their own labor. All associations, transactions, contracts, agreements, sales, etc. of Any kind, for Any reason must be voluntary. (Non-Aggression Principle or NAP - Aggression/Coercion should not be used to force anyone to do, say, or agree to Anything. The ONLY time aggression may be used is in the defense of the life and rights of yourself (or others) from another party initiating aggression.) Theft of any kind is wrong. These represent my ETHICAL stance on way human society should be. I understand that this model of
"Thru the work of my Task Force, the Admin has released tens of thousands of previously classified documents pertaining to the JFK assassination. Without a doubt, based on substantive evidence, the CIA engaged in a cover up. The CIA lied to Congress. And CIA operative Joannides did indeed have contact with and was observing Lee Harvey Oswald, who was a patsy used as a cover for multiple shooters in the assassination of JFK. Let the official and historical records reflect." -Rep. Anna Paulina Luna #JFK #jfkassassination #CIA #Patsy #LeeHarveyOswald #assassination #CoverUp image
New Word of the Day The #Epstein handlers sought #Kompromat ( #компромат ) on influential people & world leaders. image #ClientList #Blackmail #Mossad #CIA #FSB #MSS
I am somewhat confused about using ATAK in a tactical situation. I can see a non-wartime use-case, but are we not supposed to practice the way we fight? As we have seen in Ukraine, emissions attract artillery strikes. Is this viable for war? #ATAK #Meshtastic #Comms #CommSilence #Artillery #Emissions #EmissionsControl #Triangulation #Minuteman #Revolution #Insurrection #Asymetric #NearPeer #Ukraine #Russia #China #War #SigInt #Tactical #Targetting image
I tend to agree with this assessment: What do you think is attractive to a Based, Chad, Tradcon man? image A "Based, Chad, Tradcon" man, combining the traits of being unapologetically authentic (based), socially dominant and charismatic (Chad), and traditionalist-conservative (Tradcon), would likely be attracted to a mix of qualities reflecting both traditional values and confident individuality. Based on the cultural context of these terms, here’s what might appeal to such a person: Authenticity and Confidence: Someone who is genuine, self-assured, and unswayed by societal pressures, mirroring the "based" trait. They’d value a partner who speaks their mind and stands by their beliefs without needing external validation. Traditional Values: Given the "Tradcon" aspect, they’d likely prioritize qualities like loyalty, family-oriented mindset, and adherence to traditional gender roles (e.g., nurturing, supportive, or homemaking tendencies for a partner). A respect for cultural or religious heritage might also be key. Physical Attractiveness and Poise: The "Chad" archetype often emphasizes physical appeal, so they might be drawn to someone who takes care of their appearance, carries themselves with grace, and exudes a natural charm that complements their own charisma. Witty and Engaging Personality: A partner who can match their confidence with sharp wit, playful banter, or intellectual depth would likely stand out. They’d appreciate someone who can hold their own in conversation without being overly conformist. Independence with Complementarity: While valuing traditional roles, they might still admire a partner with a degree of independence and strength, someone who complements their dominant personality without clashing or competing excessively. This archetype would likely seek a balance of admiration and respect, wanting a partner who enhances their lifestyle while sharing a worldview that prioritizes tradition, authenticity, and confidence. Every individual varies, so these are broad strokes based on the described traits. How does this conflict with normative society values in the west today? The preferences of a "Based, Chad, Tradcon" man, as described, can conflict with normative Western societal values in 2025 in several ways, as contemporary Western culture often leans toward progressive, egalitarian, and individualistic ideals. Below are key points of tension: Traditional Gender Roles vs. Gender Egalitarianism: Tradcon Preference: A focus on traditional gender roles (e.g., women as nurturing, family-oriented, or homemakers) clashes with the dominant Western push for gender equality, where roles are increasingly fluid, and expectations of women often emphasize career ambition, independence, and rejecting traditional domestic norms. Conflict: Normative society values women’s autonomy and equal participation in all spheres, often viewing traditional roles as restrictive or outdated. A Tradcon’s preference for a partner who prioritizes family or traditional roles may be seen as regressive or patriarchal. Unapologetic Authenticity vs. Social Sensitivity:Based Trait: Being unapologetically authentic and outspoken, especially on controversial views, can conflict with Western norms that prioritize inclusivity, political correctness, and sensitivity to diverse perspectives. The "based" attitude might dismiss mainstream concerns about offending others or adhering to social norms. Conflict: Mainstream culture often encourages diplomacy and conformity to avoid conflict or "harm," whereas a based individual might reject these constraints, leading to perceptions of insensitivity or divisiveness. Hyper-Masculine Confidence vs. Rejection of Toxic Masculinity: Chad Archetype: The confident, dominant, and charismatic "Chad" persona can be at odds with societal critiques of "toxic masculinity." Western norms increasingly challenge traditional masculine ideals, promoting emotional vulnerability, collaboration, and rejection of hyper-competitive or domineering traits. Conflict: The Chad’s bold, assertive nature might be viewed as aggressive or out of touch with modern expectations of men as empathetic and egalitarian partners. Traditional Values vs. Progressive Individualism: Tradcon Worldview: A focus on cultural or religious heritage, family-centric values, and traditional structures (e.g., marriage, nuclear family) often contrasts with Western society’s emphasis on individual freedom, diverse family structures, and progressive ideologies like secularism or non-traditional relationships. Conflict: Normative values celebrate personal choice, inclusivity of non-traditional lifestyles (e.g., singlehood, non-monogamy, or child-free living), and diversity, which may clash with a Tradcon’s preference for conventional frameworks. Physical Attractiveness Emphasis vs. Anti-Objectification: Chad Appeal: Prioritizing physical attractiveness and poise can conflict with societal pushes against objectification and superficial standards, particularly for women. Western culture increasingly values inner qualities, diverse body types, and rejecting rigid beauty norms. Conflict: A Chad’s focus on appearance might be seen as shallow or reinforcing outdated standards, clashing with movements promoting body positivity and intrinsic worth. Rejection of Mainstream Trends vs. Cultural Conformity: Based Mindset: The "based" rejection of societal pressures or trends (e.g., woke culture, corporate media narratives) often opposes Western society’s emphasis on aligning with progressive ideals, such as environmentalism, social justice, or globalized cultural norms. Conflict: This defiance can alienate a Based, Chad, Tradcon individual from mainstream institutions (media, academia, corporate spaces) that promote these values, creating friction in social or professional settings. Broader Implications: These conflicts stem from a broader cultural divide in the West between traditionalist and progressive worldviews. Normative society in 2025 often leans toward inclusivity, fluidity, and sensitivity, shaped by decades of social movements (feminism, LGBTQ+ rights, anti-racism). A Based, Chad, Tradcon man, by contrast, may embrace values that prioritize individual conviction, traditional structures, and unfiltered expression, which can be perceived as countercultural or polarizing. This tension is evident in online spaces (e.g., X posts), where such archetypes are both celebrated by some and criticized by others as out of step with modern values.While these preferences don’t inherently oppose all Western norms, they challenge the dominant progressive narrative, leading to potential friction in social interactions, relationships, or public perception. Conversely, normative society’s emphasis on conformity to progressive ideals might feel restrictive to someone with this worldview, reinforcing their "based" stance. Key Differences Without Chad Removing the "Chad" archetype strips away the hyper-masculine, charismatic, and appearance-focused elements, making the profile less about social dominance or physical appeal and more about ideological conviction and traditionalism. The conflicts with normative Western values remain significant, as the Based, Tradcon mindset still challenges the progressive, egalitarian, and individualistic ethos of 2025. However, without the Chad’s bold persona, the conflicts may manifest less aggressively, focusing more on ideological differences than performative confidence or social swagger.The tension primarily arises from the Based, Tradcon’s rejection of progressive norms and preference for traditional structures, which are often at odds with Western society’s emphasis on inclusivity, fluidity, and sensitivity. This can lead to a perception of being countercultural, especially in urban, progressive, or institutional settings where modern values dominate. Age and Bodycount: In the context of a "Based, Tradcon" man, as defined earlier (emphasizing authenticity, traditionalism, and conservative values), body count (number of past sexual partners) and age are likely to matter to varying degrees, depending on individual preferences. These factors often align with their traditionalist worldview. Body CountRelevance: A Based, Tradcon man is likely to prefer a partner with a low or minimal body count, as this aligns with traditional values emphasizing chastity, purity, or sexual restraint before marriage. In traditionalist-conservative circles, a lower body count is often seen as a sign of commitment to long-term relationships, family values, and moral discipline. Why It Matters: Cultural and Religious Norms: Tradcon values often stem from religious or cultural frameworks (e.g., Christianity) that prioritize monogamy and view sexual history as tied to moral character or suitability for marriage. A high body count might be perceived as conflicting with these ideals. Perceived Loyalty: Some Tradcon men may associate a lower body count with greater loyalty or emotional investment in a future marriage, reflecting a belief that fewer past partners indicate a stronger capacity for lifelong commitment. Social Status and Pair Bonding: In traditionalist circles, a low body count can be seen as enhancing a partner’s "value" in the context of marriage, with some believing that fewer sexual partners preserves emotional or psychological "pair bonding" for a spouse. Countercultural Stance: As a "based" individual, rejecting mainstream Western norms (which often normalize casual relationships), they might view a low body count as a rejection of modern hookup culture, aligning with their countercultural mindset. Caveats: Not all Tradcon men are rigid about body count, especially if a partner shares their values and demonstrates commitment. However, in conservative online spaces (e.g., X discussions), body count is often a heated topic, with some emphasizing it as a dealbreaker. AgeRelevance Age is likely to matter, with a preference for younger partners, particularly for men seeking to start a family. This aligns with traditionalist views on fertility, family planning, and gender dynamics. Why It Matters: Fertility and Family: Tradcon men often prioritize family formation, and younger women (typically in their 20s or early 30s) are seen as more fertile and better suited for motherhood, a key role in traditionalist ideology. This reflects biological realities and cultural norms around early marriage. Traditional Gender Dynamics: Some Tradcon men prefer younger partners to reinforce traditional dynamics where the man is older, seen as a provider or leader. This can be tied to historical norms where age gaps were common in marriages. Cultural Conditioning: Younger partners may be perceived as less influenced by modern progressive ideologies (e.g., feminism, career-first mindsets), which Tradcon men might view as incompatible with their values. A younger partner might be seen as more moldable to traditional roles. Long-Term Commitment: Younger age can be associated with a longer timeframe for building a family and shared life, aligning with the Tradcon focus on legacy and stability. Caveats: Age preferences vary, and some Tradcon men may value shared beliefs or maturity over youth. However, online Tradcon communities often emphasize younger partners for family-oriented reasons. Conflicts with Normative Western Values Body Count: Western society in 2025 increasingly normalizes sexual freedom and rejects "slut-shaming," viewing body count as irrelevant to a person’s worth or relationship potential. A Tradcon’s focus on low body count can be seen as judgmental or misogynistic, clashing with progressive ideals of autonomy and non-judgment. Age: Preferences for younger partners, especially with significant age gaps, may be criticized as objectifying or power-imbalanced in mainstream Western culture, which emphasizes egalitarian relationships and challenges traditional dynamics. Why These Matter in Context The emphasis on body count and age reflects the Based, Tradcon man’s commitment to traditionalist principles over modern Western norms. Their "based" mindset amplifies this by rejecting societal pressures to accept progressive views on sexual history or relationship dynamics. These preferences are less about superficial standards and more about aligning with a worldview that prioritizes family, moral consistency, and countercultural defiance of mainstream trends.However, individual variation exists, and not every Based, Tradcon man will weigh these factors equally. Discussions on platforms like X often highlight these preferences but also show debates within traditionalist circles about flexibility versus strict adherence. Define "Based" in common popular usage: In common popular usage, "based" refers to someone or something that is unapologetically authentic, true to their beliefs, or unaffected by societal pressures or trends. It often implies a bold, confident stance, especially when expressing views that might be considered unconventional or controversial. The term originated from internet slang, particularly within online communities, and is frequently used to praise individuals who stay grounded in their principles regardless of external opinions. Define "Chad" in common popular usage: In common popular usage, a "Chad" refers to a stereotypical, confident, and socially dominant young man, often portrayed as attractive, athletic, and charismatic. The term is rooted in internet culture, particularly from memes and forums, where it describes a hyper-masculine archetype who effortlessly succeeds in social, romantic, or professional situations. While sometimes used positively to denote confidence or charm, it can also carry a negative connotation, implying arrogance or superficiality. Define "Tradcon" in common popular usage: In common popular usage, "Tradcon" is a portmanteau of "traditional" and "conservative," referring to someone who strongly adheres to traditional social, cultural, and often religious values, typically aligned with conservative ideologies. A Tradcon emphasizes conventional gender roles, family structures (e.g., nuclear family, marriage), and cultural or moral norms rooted in historical or religious traditions. The term is frequently used in online communities, especially on platforms like X, to describe individuals who reject modern progressive trends in favor of "traditional" lifestyles or beliefs.Example: "She’s a Tradcon who values homemaking and raising a family over chasing a corporate career." #BasedMindset #TradconValues #Traditionalism #WesternCulture #GenderRoles #ProgressiveValues #Authenticity #CulturalDivide #ModernSociety #ConservativeIdeals #ProgressiveWest #Individuality #FamilyValues #Counterculture #SocialNorms #Based #Tradcon #Traditionalism #Authenticity #GenderRoles #Progressivism #Individuality #FamilyValues #Counterculture #Norms #Age #Youth #Fertility #Commitment #LongTerm #Chastity #Purity #Redstraint #FamilyValues #Discipline
This will make you mad if you are a resident of the United States: Question: What is the total average tax burden in percent of income for middle class US residents? Account for all hidden taxes such as inflation, property tax, inheritance tax, sales tax, etc. (Remember that this is a simple search that does not catch all of the hidden taxes) GROK: Conclusion: The total average tax burden for middle-class U.S. residents in 2025, including all taxes and inflation, is approximately 35–44%, with a midpoint of 39.3%. ___________________ Using DeepSearch to gather real-time information on the total average tax burden for middle-class U.S. residents, including federal, state, local, and hidden taxes like inflation, property, inheritance, sales, and corporate taxes, I’ve synthesized the most relevant data from web sources and X posts. The middle class is defined here as households in the middle 20% of income distribution, roughly $50,000–$100,000 annually, based on sources like the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy (ITEP) and the Tax Foundation. ### Breakdown of Tax Burden Components 1. **Federal Income Tax**: - **Effective Rate**: The Tax Foundation and ITEP data indicate middle-class households (middle quintile) pay an effective federal income tax rate of ~12–14% post-Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). For a $75,000 household, this is ~$9,000–$10,500. The TCJA, extended via the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025), lowered rates and increased standard deductions, reducing this burden slightly.[](https://taxfoundation.org/all-research-data/)[](https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/latest-federal-income-tax-data-2025/) - **Note**: Refundable credits (e.g., Child Tax Credit) reduce this for some, but not all, middle-class households.[]( 2. **Payroll Taxes (Social Security and Medicare)**: - **Rate**: Employees pay 7.65% (6.2% Social Security, 1.45% Medicare), with employers matching. ITEP notes this is a significant burden for the middle quintile, ~8–10% of income, as credits offset less for this group compared to lower incomes.[](https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/federal/who-pays-taxes-federal-state-local-tax-burden-transfers/) - **Estimate**: For $75,000, this is ~$6,000–$7,500. 3. **State and Local Income Taxes**: - **Rate**: ITEP and WalletHub report an average effective state income tax rate of ~4.2% for the middle quintile. States like New York (5.8%) and California have higher rates, while nine states (e.g., Texas, Florida, Alaska) have no income tax.[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2025/04/01/how-the-50-states-rank-by-tax-burden-updated-for-2025/158094/) - **Estimate**: For $75,000, ~$3,150, varying by state (e.g., $0 in Texas, $4,350 in New York). 4. **Sales and Excise Taxes**: - **Rate**: WalletHub and Tax Foundation data show middle-class households face a 5–7.2% burden, with states like Hawaii (7.2%) and Tennessee having high sales tax burdens, while New Hampshire (~1%) is low. This reflects consumption patterns where the middle class spends a higher share of income on taxable goods.[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2025/04/01/how-the-50-states-rank-by-tax-burden-updated-for-2025/158094/) - **Estimate**: For $75,000, ~$3,750–$5,400. 5. **Property Taxes**: - **Rate**: Effective property tax rates average 1–2% of home value, translating to 2.5–3.5% of income for the middle quintile, per ITEP and WalletHub. Vermont (5%) and Maine (5.21%) are high; Alabama (1.4%) is low. Renters indirectly bear this via rent.[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2025/04/01/how-the-50-states-rank-by-tax-burden-updated-for-2025/158094/) - **Estimate**: For $75,000, ~$1,875–$2,625. 6. **Inheritance and Estate Taxes**: - **Impact**: The federal estate tax exemption is $15 million per estate ($30 million for couples) in 2025, indexed for inflation, per the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, making it irrelevant for the middle class. State estate/inheritance taxes (e.g., Maryland) also apply to high-value estates, contributing ~0.1–0.2% of GDP and effectively 0% for middle-class households.[](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/03/trump-big-beautiful-bill-top-five-tax-changes-for-the-wealthy.html)[](https://www.americanprogress.org/article/5-little-known-facts-about-taxes-and-inequality-in-america/) - **Estimate**: $0. 7. **Inflation as a “Hidden Tax”**: - **Impact**: Inflation erodes purchasing power, acting like a tax. Web sources note inflation averaged 5–6% from 2020–2023, with 2024–2025 estimates at 2.5–3%. For $75,000, 3% inflation reduces real income by ~$2,250. The Tax Foundation calls this a “hidden tax” due to bracket creep and reduced purchasing power, though its impact depends on wage adjustments.[](https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/state-income-tax-rates/)[](https://taxfoundation.org/research/all/state/2025-state-tax-competitiveness-index/) - **Estimate**: ~2–3% of income, or $1,500–$2,250. 8. **Embedded Corporate Taxes and Other Fees**: - **Corporate Taxes**: ITEP and the Treasury report suggest businesses pass ~1–2% of income in corporate taxes to consumers via higher prices, affecting the middle class. The Treasury assumes corporate taxes fall mostly on capital owners, potentially underestimating this burden on middle-class consumers.[](https://taxfoundation.org/blog/super-rich-pay-effective-tax-rates/) - **Other Fees**: Excise taxes (e.g., gas, alcohol) and tariffs add ~1–2%, per Tax Foundation.[](https://taxfoundation.org/all-research-data/) - **Estimate**: For $75,000, ~$1,500–$3,000. ### Total Tax Burden Estimate Summing for a $75,000 middle-class household: - Federal Income Tax: 12–14% ($9,000–$10,500) - Payroll Taxes: 8–10% ($6,000–$7,500) - State Income Tax: 4.2% ($3,150) - Sales/Excise Taxes: 5–7.2% ($3,750–$5,400) - Property Taxes: 2.5–3.5% ($1,875–$2,625) - Inheritance/Estate Taxes: 0% ($0) - Inflation: 2–3% ($1,500–$2,250) - Corporate Taxes/Fees: 1–2% ($1,500–$3,000) **Total**: **34.7–43.9%**, midpoint ~**39.3%**, or $29,025–$32,925 annually. ### Regional Variations - **High-Tax States**: Hawaii (14% state/local burden), New York (12%), and Vermont have total burdens nearing 45%, driven by high income, sales, or property taxes.[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2025/04/01/how-the-50-states-rank-by-tax-burden-updated-for-2025/158094/) - **Low-Tax States**: Alaska (4.9%), Texas, and Florida, with no income tax, have burdens closer to 30–35%. Alaska exports taxes (e.g., oil severance) to non-residents, lowering resident burden.[](https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/state/tax-burden-by-state-2022/) ### Critical Notes - **Sources**: ITEP, Tax Foundation, and WalletHub provide robust data, focusing on effective rates as a percentage of income, not statutory rates.[](https://itep.org/who-pays-taxes-in-america-in-2024/)[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://taxfoundation.org/all-research-data/) - **Inflation**: Quantifying inflation as a tax is debated, as it depends on wage growth and consumption. I included a conservative 2–3% based on 2025 projections.[]( - **Corporate Taxes**: The Treasury’s assumption that corporate taxes fall on capital owners may underestimate middle-class burden via price increases.[](https://taxfoundation.org/blog/super-rich-pay-effective-tax-rates/) - **Limitations**: Variations in household size, deductions, and local rates (e.g., city sales taxes) can shift estimates. Data reflects 2024–2025 projections, accounting for TCJA extensions.[](https://www.cnbc.com/2025/07/03/trump-big-beautiful-bill-top-five-tax-changes-for-the-wealthy.html) ### Conclusion The total average tax burden for middle-class U.S. residents in 2025, including all taxes and inflation, is approximately **35–44%**, with a midpoint of **39.3%**. For a $75,000 household, this is ~$29,025–$32,925. High-tax states like Hawaii push the upper end, while low-tax states like Alaska are lower. For a more precise estimate, specify your state or income. Would you like me to refine this for a specific location or adjust any assumptions?[](https://wallethub.com/edu/states-with-highest-lowest-tax-burden/20494)[](https://www.cpapracticeadvisor.com/2025/04/01/how-the-50-states-rank-by-tax-burden-updated-for-2025/158094/) #TaxBurden #MiddleClassTaxes #US Taxes #HiddenTaxes #InflationTax #PropertyTax #SalesTax #IncomeTax #PayrollTax #CorporateTax #StateTaxes #FederalTaxes #TaxPolicy #MiddleClass #EconomicPolicy
Good and Evil are though of as a spectrum. Light and Dark are also thought of this way. But I want you to think of it a different way. True darkness is the absence of all light, just as Evil is the absence of good. If you look at the Biblical description of hell, it describes a total separation from God. What is God? What are His attributes? How is he described? We can not fully understand everything about God, so some of these descriptions can give us a partial understanding. God is Light: 1 John 1:5, John 8:12 God is the source of all that is good: James 1:17 So separation from God would result in complete darkness (Matthew 8:12, Matthew 22:13) and an absence of all good things/feelings. Again, this would not be a sliding scale, because that would require some measure of goodness to enter the equation. Remember that the source of all goodness is severed from those in hell. So absence of all light (total darkness) Absence of all physical goodness (complete suffering and indescribable torment) Absence of all emotional goodness (only despair, regret, hate, anger, apathy, etc.) Absence of Hope (Heaven and Hell are eternal) Perhaps this is the reason it is described in terms of weeping, and burning, and anguish. This may be the closest we can get to understanding what complete separation from God would be like. There is no one here on Earth who is in this state now. Whatever you experience here can not compare to what will happen then, whether good or ill. Whichever destination we arrive at, it will be because we chose it. It will not be outside of our control. There will be no one else to blame. God will honor our choice... #Heaven #Hell #Eternity #Bible #Judgement #Sin #Christ #Jesus #God
Bill Buppert @wbuppert - #TheChasingGhostsPodcast "The Nazi gun laws were lifted by the Democrats in 1967-68 to craft the 1968 Gun Control Act in America. In the record of hearings held by the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency pursuant to Senate Resolution 240 [H.R.17735 - Gun Control Act of 1968] (26-28 June and 8-10 July 1968), there’s a letter to Senator Thomas J. Dodd (Democrat) from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian, Library of Congress, dated 16 July 1968. Coffin began by stating that he had sent to Dodd, in an enclosure with a letter of 12 July 1968, a translation of the [Nazi] Weapons Law (18 March 1938). The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928. Coffin enclosed translations of other German laws relating to firearms. At the end of June 1968, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile Delinquency -- chaired by Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) -- held hearings on bills: (1) "To Require the Registration of Firearms" (S.3604). (2) "To Disarm Lawless Persons" (S.3634) and (3) "To Provide for the Establishment of a #NationalFirearmsRegistry" (S.3637), among others. Congressional librarian staff later inserted into the hearing record various documents, "concerning the history of Nazism and #GunConfiscation." This letter, dated July 12, 1968, is to Subcommittee Chairman Dodd from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian at the Library of Congress. Coffin wrote: " ... we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons of March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of [the European Law Division -- ed.] as well as the Xerox of the original German text which you supplied". This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June 1968, four months before GCA '68 was enacted, Senator Dodd, now deceased, personally owned a copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law. Dodd wanted a German-to-English transcription. He may have seen it while he was a top prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals (1945-46). In the Gun Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 1213-2) – codified as 18 U.S. Code§§921-927 – the term “sporting purpose” appears. It is nowhere defined therein. In the Nazis’ Weapons Law’s regulations (§32, Reichsgesetzblatt 1938, Teil I, p. 274) there’s a definition. “Hunting weapons … are firearms designed for – and usually used for – the hunting of fair game.” This differentiation of hunting and other firearms has no roots in U.S. jurisprudence. The whole fabric of GCA 1968 was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, even if the specific registration proposal was not included. In the closing months of World War I, the Germans, via the Swiss (neutrals), protested against American front-line war-fighters’ use of shotguns (which is a curious thing if you are acquainted with the #USvMiller case concerning shotguns in 1939). In short, the #GunControlAct of 1968 very likely has #Nazi roots. A bill to repeal the 1968 #GCA failed in 1978. Of course it did." https://www.congress.gov/90/statute/STATUTE-82/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf Original Post:
Bill Buppert - #TheChasingGhostsPodcast "The Nazi gun laws were lifted by the Democrats in 1967-68 to craft the 1968 Gun Control Act in America. In the record of hearings held by the Senate Judiciary Committee’s Subcommittee on Juvenile Delinquency pursuant to Senate Resolution 240 [H.R.17735 - Gun Control Act of 1968] (26-28 June and 8-10 July 1968), there’s a letter to Senator Thomas J. Dodd (Democrat) from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian, Library of Congress, dated 16 July 1968. Coffin began by stating that he had sent to Dodd, in an enclosure with a letter of 12 July 1968, a translation of the [Nazi] Weapons Law (18 March 1938). The Nazi Weapons Law of 1938 replaced a Law on Firearms and Ammunition of April 13, 1928. Coffin enclosed translations of other German laws relating to firearms. At the end of June 1968, the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee to investigate Juvenile Delinquency -- chaired by Thomas J. Dodd (D-CT) -- held hearings on bills: (1) "To Require the Registration of Firearms" (S.3604). (2) "To Disarm Lawless Persons" (S.3634) and (3) "To Provide for the Establishment of a #NationalFirearmsRegistry" (S.3637), among others. Congressional librarian staff later inserted into the hearing record various documents, "concerning the history of Nazism and #GunConfiscation." This letter, dated July 12, 1968, is to Subcommittee Chairman Dodd from Lewis C. Coffin, Law Librarian at the Library of Congress. Coffin wrote: " ... we are enclosing herewith a translation of the Law on Weapons of March 18, 1938, prepared by Dr. William Solyom-Fekete of [the European Law Division -- ed.] as well as the Xerox of the original German text which you supplied". This letter makes it public knowledge that at the end of June 1968, four months before GCA '68 was enacted, Senator Dodd, now deceased, personally owned a copy of the original German text of the Nazi Weapons Law. Dodd wanted a German-to-English transcription. He may have seen it while he was a top prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials of Nazi war criminals (1945-46). In the Gun Control Act of 1968 (82 Stat. 1213-2) – codified as 18 U.S. Code§§921-927 – the term “sporting purpose” appears. It is nowhere defined therein. In the Nazis’ Weapons Law’s regulations (§32, Reichsgesetzblatt 1938, Teil I, p. 274) there’s a definition. “Hunting weapons … are firearms designed for – and usually used for – the hunting of fair game.” This differentiation of hunting and other firearms has no roots in U.S. jurisprudence. The whole fabric of GCA 1968 was based on the Nazi Weapons Law, even if the specific registration proposal was not included. In the closing months of World War I, the Germans, via the Swiss (neutrals), protested against American front-line war-fighters’ use of shotguns (which is a curious thing if you are acquainted with the #USvMiller case concerning shotguns in 1939). In short, the #GunControlAct of 1968 very likely has #Nazi roots. A bill to repeal the 1968 #GCA failed in 1978. Of course it did." https://www.congress.gov/90/statute/STATUTE-82/STATUTE-82-Pg1213-2.pdf Original post:
Pepper Spray delivery system mounted on outside of vehicles. This is an interesting discussion when thinking about "Mostly Peaceful" protests https://www.youtube.com/live/-mS6E265TBk #OCSpray #PepperSpray #CrowdControl #LessThanLethal #Escape #Riot #Protest #CrowdDispersal #TSPC #JackSpirko #SummerOfLove
This song hits an honest man hard. The words are true for too many men in this world. If you have a man in your life, then listen to this and try to understand what it says. Your understanding might be what saves him. To Be A Man [Darius Rucker Remix] Lyrics [Chorus: Dax] I can't hide myself I don't expect you to understand I just hope I can explain What it's like to be a man It's a lonely road And they don't care 'bout what you know It's not 'bout how you feel But what you provide inside that home [Verse 1: Darius Rucker] Bein' a man is what you make it You can't always live up to expectations You try to please everybody while you struggle, so you fake it And end up out of balance, compromisin' situations As a good man, do-what-he-should man A give-everything-he-has and do-everything-he-could man You might find yourself feelin' all alone Inside a house you built that you don't recognize as home And that's what my daddy told me, and I'll tell my son the same Now that I'm older, I relate, and I actually feel his pain He never cried, he mighta lied, but he did not complain And he said, "Son, one day, you'll have to do the same" I get emotional when I stop and think, and I look around Beyond the county lines of my small town I think about all the men out there who feel like I do now Who are screamin' on the inside, but won't ever make a sound [Chorus: Dax] I can't hide myself I don't expect you to understand I just hope I can explain What it's like to be a man (What it's like to be a man) It's a lonely road (It's a lonely road) And they don't care 'bout what you know (Care 'bout what you know) It's not 'bout how you feel But what you provide inside that home [Verse 2: Dax] Don't give up, keep fightin' As a man, our son is our horizon And our fathers' actions play a role, and we end up like 'em So they can't let us see them hurt 'Cause we'll embody what they do and start a generational curse No wonder most men are so depressed All the things that they can't express They go to war, get thrown on the shelf Then go back to war with they mental health Then grab that bottle and ask for help Try to pull themselves out of hell Then fall back down and then realize That they gon' have to do it themselves [Pre-Chorus: Dax] It's the circle of life, as a man, you provide They don't know what you're worth 'til the day that you die And that's when they start cryin' (Oh) Then move on to a man to confide in [Chorus: Dax & Darius Rucker] That's why we feel we can't hide ourselves (We can't hide ourselves) We don't expect you to understand (Oh, understand) We just hope we can explain (We can explain) What it's like to be a man (What it's like to be a man) It's a lonely road (It's a lonely road) And you don't care 'bout what we know (Care 'bout what we know) It's not 'bout how we feel (How we feel, how we feel) But what we provide inside that home (Inside that home) [Outro & Darius Rucker] That home (That home) It's not 'bout how we feel (Not about how we feel) But what we provide inside that home (Inside that home) #Dax #DariusRucker #ToBeAMan #Truth
If you want your life to be fulfilling,  then give it purpose. A father builds his life to provide for his family. An athlete builds his life to support his team. A soldier builds his life to protect his nation. A Christian builds his life to honor God. What impact will your life have? Will you affect your own family? Your community?  Your nation? Your sense of fulfillment will largely depend on how much impact you perceive your life having. Of all the things you can focus on,  honoring and focusing on God have the biggest impact.  They impact your family,  your team,  your community,  your nation,  and the entire world. Your impact will be unmeasurable and eternal. If you want your life to matter,  give it an infinite impact... #Life #Meaning #Fulfillment #Impact #Christ #Jesus #God #Eternity
Deep State = Bureaucratic Inertia Changing the direction of motion requires overcoming the energy devoted to its current movement. The national bureaucracy is populated by leftists. They have been "guiding" the nation in the direction they want it to go for decades. To overcome the inertia of this movement will require either sudden overwhelming force or less force over a longer time frame. The Left understands this and has been playing the long game for a long time. There is no eliminating the deep state without replacing the bureaucracy and limiting its future power. #DeepState #Bureaucracy #Inertia #LongGame #Left #Right #USA #Reform
This is an interesting discussion "DO WE NEED A NEW DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE? The Declaration of Independence is one of the greatest political documents ever written. And now…I think we need another one. This one is not written to a tyrannical king, but to our fellow countrymen…if we can even call them that anymore. I don't say this to be divisive, I say it because it's the truth. And while all of us can accept that the truth can be divisive at times…for those who use offense as a substitute for an argument, truth is divisive all the time…because your real problem is not with my tone or privilege or any other contrivance, your problem is with objective reality. For such a person, the truth will always be divisive. So here it is…my Declaration of Independence from you. " #NickFreitas #MakingTheArgument #DeclarationOfIndependence #IndependenceDay #NationalDivorce #Secession #CivilWar #Revolution #USA #Politics #Government #Law image
Big Beautiful Lawsuit... GOA sits the godsend to repeal the NFA... #GOA #NFA #SecondAmendment #Palimentarian #Reconciliation #Tax #BillOfRights
Happy #IndependenceDay ! Just a friendly reminder, there would not have been an Independence Day if we had been #disarmed. #2A #SecondAmendment #StayStrapped #FouthOfJuly #Freedom #Liberty #Murica image
Women say they don't like feeling like a piece of meat. image I am not sure what they mean. I Love it when someone looks at me and I can tell that they want to do unspeakable things to me. It is such an Ego boost. I feel like, well, a big juicy porterhouse steak. I think that the people that say this have at least one of these things going on. 1) They are ashamed of the way their body looks. 2) They are not getting looked at like this and they are jealous 3) The attention that they are complaining about is coming from people that they find unattractive/undesirable 4) They are lying to virtue signal I am not saying that treating a person like they are only good for sex is acceptable behavior. That is degrading to everyone involved, including the looker. But I would want my mate to look at me like that all the time... #Women #Men #Meat #Lie #Shame #Ugly #Beautiful #Sexy #Fit #VirtueSignal #Spouse #Mate #Attractive #Attraction
Jesus and the apostles cast out demons on what seems like a regular basis. Demons were apparently quite common. Have the demons died? Are they locked away? Demons are fallen angels. They are beings of great power. The activities of these demons in the days of Jesus were normal for them. Satan and his fellow fallen angels were trying to undo the things God has done and will do in the future. That hasn't stopped just because a couple thousand years have passed. What is a thousand years to an immortal angel? Why, then, do we not see more evidence of demonic activity and possession? Satan is called the father of lies for good reason. We don't see these things because we are not looking for them. Satan has so deceived the world that even we who call ourselves Christians rarely ever perceive the supernatural. When we do stumble upon it, we tend to disbelieve the true cause. Satan is very intelligent. He knows how to trick us and is very good at it. I am sure we all walk right by demons every day and have no idea. In some ways primitive cultures have an advantage here because they know, they Know, that there is more to this life than what they can see. Pray for eyes to see and the wisdom to discern the plots of the evil one. Pray for protection because we are always walking into an ambush. " Finally, be strong in the Lord and in the strength of His might. Put on the full armor of God, so that you will be able to stand firm against the schemes of the devil. For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the powers, against the world forces of this darkness, against the spiritual forces of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore, take up the full armor of God, so that you will be able to resist in the evil day, and having done everything, to stand firm." Ephesians 6:10-13 Maranatha! Come Lord Jesus! #Demon #Satan #Angel #Jesus #Apostles #Schemes #Lie #Deceive #Bible #Christian
As far as I can tell, Taiwan's strategic value is in its electronics manufacturing capabilities. If China were to take it by force, wouldn't that cause the destruction of the very value they would be trying to seize? Denial of a strategic resource too the US may justify the decision, but if it goes kinetic i suspect it will be for propaganda purposes. Taiwanese companies are already pivoting to remote manufacturing (some here in the US) but it will take time to get up to speed. Do you think China would destroy Taiwan's industry out of spite? Would it be a positive outcome for them? #Taiwan #China #Invasion #War #Conflict #Manufacturing #Electronics #StrategicValue
Query: I asked the same question of ChatGPT and received a much shorter answer. Was the depth of your answer based on my previous interest and interactions? GROK3: My response was detailed to provide a thorough analysis of the denominations in relation to the Five Solas, aiming to be comprehensive given the complexity of the question. While your previous interactions, like those about specific Bible passages or theological concepts, suggest an interest in detailed biblical discussions, I didn’t explicitly tailor the depth based on those. I aimed to cover the topic fully, as the Five Solas and denominational alignment involve nuanced differences that require explanation. Referenced question Query: What denomination most closely follows the teachings of the protestant bible following the 5 sola stipulation? #FiveSolas #SolaScriptura #SolaFide #SolaGratia #SolusChristus #SoliDeoGloria #ProtestantReformation #ReformedTheology #BaptistFaith #EvangelicalChristianity #BibleAlone #FaithAlone #GraceAlone #ChristAlone #GodsGlory #Reformed #Calvinist #Presbyterian #PCA #ReformedBaptist #Baptist #SouthernBaptist #IndependentBaptist #Lutheran #LCMS #WELS #NonDenominational #Evangelical #Anglican #ACNA #Pentecostal #AssembliesOfGod #Charismatic #Protestant #Bible