Cykros's avatar
Cykros
psyche_eros@iris.to
npub1lcet...3apw
πŸ‡΅πŸ‡ΈπŸ΄β€β˜ οΈ
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
Wow criticism of shitty design on a Bitcoin podcast. That's a rarity worth zapping. Now do Bitbox and their lack of an airgap, liquid (and being a shitcoin), Start9 and being a system to dumb people down and convince them that their nodes are too hard to understand, Trezor and being a steaming pile of garbage... I get it...y'all need sponsorships from somewhere. Nonetheless, refreshing to hear criticism for a change for bad design. View quoted note β†’
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
Is it just me or is Nostrudel in a state of suboptimal performance lately? I usually have it as my go-to desktop experience but it seems a bit haphazard in terms of what I actually see lately. That said, it did drive me to check out snort.social which I haven't looked at in almost a year, and it's definitely been improved. The recommended follows was particularly useful as there were people I somewhat assumed I already followed that I didn't. Just another nice reminder perhaps that different clients do different things well and the idea that we have to pick just one is a bit silly. Perhaps you have the one you'd recommend to a noob to avoid overwhelming them at first, but not sampling from the buffet is just restricting yourself unnecessarily. Save the monogamy for your human partner :-).
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
100%. Telling you who you can transact with would be problematic censorship. Telling you that you can't send dickbutts is just defining the protocol. Just like telling you you can't send 8 mb transactions. Now, HOW you do that without breaking legitimate functionality is where things get tricky. Everyone seems to want to rush in without doing the hard part: figuring this out. Policy filters were always a band aid because this is hard to do at the consensus level. And I'd be fine with lifting them: IFF we solve the matter at consensus. You want more standardized mempools? Figure out the consensus changes. Otherwise I'll just not take part in pushing garbage onto the chain. Not because I think it'll stop it from getting there, but because I have no incentive to help it do so, and it's my node. As for the 444 crowd, the FUD isn't helping. Come back when you've got a realistic solution, but just throwing out untested consensus changes into production is reckless. And let's not even talk about the rhetoric pushing it as "urgent." View quoted note β†’
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
Installed #whitenoise to play around with. Decided to be #reckless and just throw my nsec in, so feel free to shoot me a message -- looking to play around with it.
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
Ahh so it's not only my family that is crazy enough to have an pre-dinner feast at Thanksgiving. If I had all that prosciutto in front of me though I don't think I'd end up eating any turkey... View quoted note β†’
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
GM. Was chatting on discord and figured this was worth sharing here for whoever it may resonate with. Money is to Time what Fat is to Energy. If you have none of it, more money will buy you things that will save you time -- either help, tools, or preventative measures. Likewise, if you have no fat, accumulating a bit more of it will increase your stamina. Something perhaps we in the modern world forget, but those in starvation conditions don't. It is, at the end of the day, stored fuel to burn for immediate energy. However, the obsession with ever more money is not unlike the person who is never satiated. Rather than increasing their time, the pursuit of money consumes their time. Much like the accumulation of fat makes the over eater sluggish, rather than energized, and even moving themselves minimally takes more energy due to the extra load. The person with "enough" fat and "enough" money, rather than too much, or too little, can thus be considered ideally optimized. We can all probably look at our expenses for the week and know whether we have enough money, more than enough, or not enough to cover (and thus, need to work more or source credit). What gets hard, however, is understanding our expenses in the future. Hard, but not THAT hard if we think of it in real terms, at least to get a ballpark figure. We'll need housing, medical care, food, clothing -- see Maslow's hierarchy -- for however many years we are planning for. And it usually makes sense here to give ourselves a bit of a buffer (because having a little bit of extra monetary "fat" when we die is a lot less painful than having a shortfall). The issue is, fiat steals from us the ability to calculate what it will take to buy these real things. It steals from us "enough." Even saying "well, I can just invest in the stock market to avoid losing value" isn't good enough, because you still don't really know that number you're going to need. Just ask someone who retired in 2019 thinking they had just enough, before 40% of the M1 in existence got printed. To use a cliche, Bitcoin fixes this. But if you want to realize how early you are, it's only now truly being made apparent that it does. Do you think in 2013 people were throwing a stack of sats (or let's be real, bitcoins) together KNOWING their future was secured? Or when MtGox fell? Or during the Blocksize Wars? Each of these events built conviction, but that "sleep at night factor" has been hard won, as we've watched Bitcoin vanquish dragon after dragon. Anyway, this is getting to be a bit of a ramble. I guess my point is, when you're stacking your sats, and thinking about the future, maybe stop and appreciate just how blessed you are to have reasonable confidence in the fact that your ability to cover your expenses is going to be there. And if you're getting neurotic about needing more money, maybe stop and consider whether the stress you're putting into it is actually justified, or just a holdover bad habit that was instilled by systematic theft of your purchasing power. When your boss offers you overtime and you're weighing whether you want to take it or spend time with your family, ask yourself, "do I need this extra slice of cake?" It's an answer for everyone to decide based on their own situation, but I hope you can at least take the time to be thoughtful, and to reduce some of the anxiety and stress around it. Your blood pressure, among other things, will thank you.
Cykros's avatar
Cykros 3 months ago
'We're gonna get 10 inches.' Why are the weather men like bragadocious teenage boys that can't deliver on promises? image
↑