Good morning!

@jonatack is the most honest Bitcoin developer out there, simply because he lives a 100% Bitcoin lifestyle. Unfortunately, he was one of Core’s victims. If you want an accurate picture of what’s going on, listen to him.

The bip-110 supporters: - You didn't understand Bitcoin - You still don't understand Bitcoin - You're mentally challenged - You keep making fools of yourselves - Now you're shitcoiners Nothing I've said here means that I'm in favor of spam or the Bitcoin Core team of transsexuals. But you're no different from NPCs—you only see things in black and white

Payjoin Dev Kit 1.0

Payjoin Dev Kit 1.0 | Payjoin

Payjoin Dev Kit's first stable release

By @samahoole 1979: fasting glucose over 140 makes you diabetic. 1997: lowered to 126. Millions of new diabetics. Same blood. 1997: prediabetes starts at 110. 2003: lowered to 100. A third of American adults, created by a footnote. 1984: high blood pressure is 160/95. 2017: lowered to 130/80. American hypertension goes from 32 per cent of adults to 46. Thirty-one million new patients in a morning. 2001: the cholesterol target is 130. 2004: lowered to 100, and to 70 for the high risk. Statin eligibility expands by millions. Eight of the nine men who wrote that 2004 update were on the payroll of companies selling statins. They disclosed it only when forced. 1994: a WHO panel invents osteopenia. Bone that is not thin enough to break, given a name and a prescription. Half of older women qualify. Nobody got sicker on any of those dates. A committee sat down and a number moved. The threshold drops, the market widens, and the drug is already licensed and sitting in the warehouse. Your grandfather was healthy at 145/92. You are ill at 132/81. Nothing about the body has changed. Only the paperwork, and who profits from it.

As you know, I was a fan of knots because of its variety of filters and policies, but a critic of bip-110 because, as I said, that bip was dead on arrival. I also warned that, for me, after the BIP-110 mess, Knots was dead and unreliable, so now I’m running that damn Core 31 with its trans and rainbow themes, but with op_return and baremultisig disabled. That’s just how it is—we don’t have anything better. I have a sex reassignment surgery scheduled for next month.

Now that the bip-110 fantasy is over, what are we talking about?

I'm not here to sell you any product; I'm not going to take your money. I just anonymously fund and contribute to privacy projects. But I am here to tell you that you're an asshole and an idiot. I hope you like it.

💯

How does it feel to have to resync your nodes again? I warned you—now what am I supposed to do? Have sex with your wife?

I think Luke has sinister intentions, too. The three “apocalyptic” threats cited by statists are: - money laundering - terrorism - child pornography They use these three arguments as a basis for restricting all civil liberties. Spam? No. Child pornography isn’t the main cause of spam on Bitcoin—I don’t know if it even exists—but that’s a textbook statist red flag. View quoted note →

The vast majority of Bitcoiners aren't much smarter than people who use fiat currency. Just accept it. Stupidity has been around in Bitcoin for many years.

😂

Well, the bip-110 has already failed. And it has proven that you bip-110 supporters are idiots and don't understand Bitcoin. As far as I'm concerned, Luke is completely discredited, just like Knots. The End 🎉

I’m not advocating for multisig—it’s definitely not the right method for most users, and many will end up in trouble—I’m just saying that multisig mitigates many risks as long as you use different devices and different sources of entropy. But damn, some people are actually advocating for splitting everything across multiple wallets. Maybe they won’t lose it, but their kids will lose everything. This is bullshit; there’s no good solution, so stop acting like you’re God.

Any device designed for Bitcoin users has strong incentives to operate maliciously—whether it’s a watch, a hardware wallet, a software wallet, or a dildo. In this regard, Greg Maxwell is right: use general-purpose hardware and software that has been reviewed by thousands of pairs of eyes, such as Bitcoin Core. But this means you’d have to use at least a 2-of-3 scheme with four computers—three of them offline—and digital backups. Plus, the computers should be from different manufacturers and run different operating systems. 99.99% of the people in this space wouldn’t even know where to start, and I could start teaching courses and make a fortune 😂.