Holy shit, this is worse than I thought. We’ve got woke people running Core who allow spam and tell you it’s not spam. We’ve got lunatics on the Knots side who deny the reality of a softfork without sufficient community support. We have the idiots who ignore all of this. God, we’re screwed. I’ll have to go back to gold—at least its physics can’t be changed by idiots.

I really don't understand why you're doing this. Bip-110 is legitimate; this isn't. Now I get why you got the COVID vaccine and why you were wearing a mask—either you're a psychopath sold out to the CIA like Core, or you're just an idiot. View quoted note →

The main falsehood in these claims is the assertion that a split would only occur if “malicious actors carried out a counter-fork.” A BCH-style counter-fork is not necessary. The following is sufficient: 1. Some nodes activate BIP-110. 2. Other nodes/miners do not implement it. 3. A block is mined that is valid under the old rules but invalid under BIP-110. 4. BIP-110 nodes reject it; legacy nodes might accept it. Why are you misleading the community like this?

Just in case anyone doesn't get my point. My point is that everyone is dishonest, or at the very least, everyone is ignorant. That's just the way it is; politics ends up corrupting everything, even software.

So you can see how evil people are. Lopp says this in his article, which is a complete lie. All nodes that have been updated for a soft fork reject post-activation blocks that violate the new rules. SegWit, Taproot, and BIP-110 work this way. Everyone here is lying.

Cypherpunk Cogitations

A Layman's Guide to BIP-110

An explanation of why BIP-110 is reckless and doomed to fail.

When Luke speaks, he does so from the perspective that bip-110 has majority support and is bound to succeed, without considering the possibility of failure. This is only half the truth and ignores the other half. It is a completely politicized argument designed to deceive the unwary and uninformed. As I said, it’s not much different from what Core has done with the spam. View quoted note →

And that's how politicians talk View quoted note →

Right now, I have absolutely no idea which client to use. The people at Core are liars and manipulators, and the people at Knots have become just the same, dishonestly concealing the consequences of the BIP-110 failure (chain split) and the slim—if not nonexistent—chances it has of succeeding due to a total lack of strategy, which is very concerning. Anyway, bookmark this post and hold me to it if I’m wrong. View quoted note →

What worries me most is that Knots has launched a full-scale disinformation campaign surrounding the activation of BIP-110, just as Core did with spam and op_return. It’s pretty disappointing. Bitcoin has turned into the political left and right—they’re all phonies in one way or another. Open your eyes, guys—they’re being dishonest on both sides and are just using you. When something isn’t explained clearly and convincingly, it’s a textbook red flag 🚩.

The GTO is undoubtedly the most beautiful Ferrari ever made (and the second most expensive).

Without a doubt, the U.S. is the worst state in the world; while other states survive by robbing their citizens, the U.S. survives by robbing both its citizens and the rest of the world. View quoted note →

Trump Sparrow

Regardless of whether I agree with the success of the BIP-110 or not. If you have a mailbox that you set up for people to deposit money into—and you deposit money into it—if someone puts things in there that aren’t money, you’re going to consider it spam. You won’t consider it spam unless you’re stupid or work for the CIA.

Fridays are the days that pedophile Trump uses to manipulate the markets over the weekend. He’s done this more than 10 times already, but no one seems to notice. Vote even harder in the next election—at least autistic people are good at spotting patterns.

Everyone has fallen into the trap set by the three-letter agencies. Bitcoin Cash = CIA Core = CIA View quoted note →

@Jameson Lopp shitcoiner View quoted note →

1. You're a fucking shitcoiner. 2. It's obviously spam; putting state laws on the blockchain is bullshit no matter how you look at it. View quoted note →

Apple M1 dieshot