levels of Bitcoin
⛓️💥on chain >1m sats
5k sats < ⚡️lightning <1m sats
🥜 ecash < 5k sats
nodez
nodez@rizful.com
npub17ryx...9shm
₿lock by physics
nostr minimalism
手机厂商研发横向折叠屏虽然不赞同但能理解，可是都要做竖向折叠手机是什么鬼，费大劲就为了复古翻盖手机？
Alby for Safari canceled?
I can’t find it in the appstore.
View quoted note →
In general the amount should exceed 5000 sats to reduce the fee ratio to about 0.5% in the LN.
Cashu eCash is applicable for the range below 5000 sats.
Most "zaps" are below 5000 sats. This is another reason why "zaps" should switch from LN to Cashu eCash.
The essence of decentralization is the natural and equal right to participate, presenting the characteristics of a complex system on a macroscopic level. Most of the so-called decentralization is actually distributed, presenting a centralized hierarchical ruling structure on a macroscopic level, and this happens to be the most familiar to most people.
View quoted note →
#define NOSTR Notes and Other Stuff Transmitted by Relays
#define CASHU ECASH Bitcoins Transmitted by Cashu Mints
Other Stuff = Bitcoins;
return Relays += Cashu Mints;
I like mini CLI apps.
Charm
Charm
We make the command line glamorous
It is cool, but why reinvent Tor again?
View quoted note →
What’s the purpose of self hosting cashu mint for self use?
Is @npub1tnpf...kkpe dead?
long time since the last update.
Like the “Enhanced Privacy” option!
Throw away lightning.
Zap is ecash, and ecash is zap.
View quoted note →
Relay pooling is an interesting idea!
View quoted note →
nostr就像当年的bitcoin，包括那半死不活的劲…
天赋nostr权 View quoted note →
打赏太重，点赞随意。
如果用ecash把点赞按钮改造成类似b站的投币功能会不会更好？1个🪙代表1sat，可以多次投币，即表达心意又表达赞同。 View quoted note →
分类应该是客户端负责的功能，和nostr本身应无关，这个年代分类应该交给LLM，而不是 #hashtags View quoted note →
#hashtags 对nostr有意义么，或许只是一种先入为主的继承？
在 @NewSchoolBtcMaxs 老兄的帖子歪个楼，我这边不知道什么问题，一开始没看到你的回复，我还纳闷为啥文章URL没显示😅。
联想到了之前提过的回复和引用的问题，感觉nostr中回复真没必要存在，所有回复一律用引用实现，所有帖子理论上都平权，这是nostr区别于X之类中心化网络的特点。 View quoted note →