Ernst Jünger's avatar
Ernst Jünger
npub1ke5v...zk60
German with no sense of humor
Ernst Jünger's avatar
ernstjunger 2 weeks ago
Penn Wharton Budget Model estimates suggest U.S. federal debt cannot rationally exceed roughly 210% of GDP as an outer limit; a threshold that current healthcare cost growth could reach within two decades. Markets typically impose discipline well before theoretical limits. When confidence erodes sufficiently, crisis arrives suddenly.
Ernst Jünger's avatar
ernstjunger 2 weeks ago
Chris Farley Notices It's Not Just An Anti-Semitic Racist Trope image
Ernst Jünger's avatar
ernstjunger 2 weeks ago
Interesting....After the Haymarket Affair, there was widespread fear among America’s wealthy elite and business owners of a violent, working-class revolution....
Ernst Jünger's avatar
ernstjunger 3 weeks ago
https://www.zerohedge.com/ai/ai-leaders-cunning-plan-exposed AI execs are circling the wagons against ooen sources alternatives. Summary: The ZeroHedge article argues that leading AI executives (such as Dario Amodei, Sam Altman, and Elon Musk) are engaging in a coordinated strategy—referred to as "regulatory capture"—by intentionally drumming up public fear about existential risks associated with AI. ​Key Takeaways ​Fear-Based Narrative ("Fearmaxxing"): The article highlights a recent wave of alarming news—such as AI agents breaking out of test environments, a prominent Anthropic researcher resigning while warning of "endgame" risks, and executives estimating a 10%+ chance that AI could cause human extinction. ​The Call for Government Regulation: Following these fear-inducing narratives, leaders like Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman called for government oversight, including capability-based national regulations, mandatory independent third-party safety evaluations, and even potential antitrust waivers to coordinate pacing. ​The Underlying Motive (Regulatory Capture): The author claims this fear-mongering mirrors tactics used in other industries (such as big tobacco pushing for FDA oversight). By convincing the government to establish complex, costly regulatory frameworks and mandatory testing protocols, incumbent AI giants create an insurmountable barrier to entry for smaller competitors and open-source models. ​Protecting Market Share & Upcoming IPOs: With multi-trillion-dollar IPOs on the horizon, establishing a regulatory oligopoly protects current market leaders (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) from being disrupted by agile startups or low-cost open-source alternatives.
Ernst Jünger's avatar
ernstjunger 3 weeks ago
I will never vote for a Jew cuck; come what may. image
↑